Forming a team of engagers would be great, but I’m more drawn to forming a team of "Improvers". This will help improve the quality of content produced on the platform.
It’s a task I would gladly take on with anyone who shares this interest.
I love this initiative by Steemit to create a team focused on constructive comments that point out and correct faults in the main post. It will definitely help raise post quality.
But I have a few questions about how it will work in practice:
What about minor errors like bad spelling or formatting? Should those be corrected in comments too?
What if the original edits the post to fix the error? New readers won’t see what the comment was referring to. In that case, should the comment be deleted, or should the original post acknowledge the correction in an edit note so context isn’t lost?
I think clarity on this will help the team and authors work better together. Love the team spirit already.
Thanks for the feedback on my comment.
Forming a team of engagers would be great, but I’m more drawn to forming a team of "Improvers". This will help improve the quality of content produced on the platform.
It’s a task I would gladly take on with anyone who shares this interest.
But I have a few questions about how it will work in practice:
What about minor errors like bad spelling or formatting? Should those be corrected in comments too?
What if the original edits the post to fix the error? New readers won’t see what the comment was referring to. In that case, should the comment be deleted, or should the original post acknowledge the correction in an edit note so context isn’t lost?
I think clarity on this will help the team and authors work better together. Love the team spirit already.