You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Punishing Rabid Self-Upvoting of Comments

in #steemit • 7 years ago (edited)

I noticed as a new member of steemit, trying to experiment with what generates SBD in general (which everyone will naturally do by the way):

  • comments with the most upvote SBD, get put to the top!
  • who wouldn't want that for themselves?
  • Does that need to be changed as well?
7 years ago in #steemit by
$5.60
  • Past Payouts $5.60
  • - Author $5.60
  • - Curators $0.01
2 votes
Reply 5
Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago (edited)

    Finally, such "witch hunt lists" as above:

    • do not gauge if someone is contributing quality posts at the same time
    • or are bots designed to add 10 word comments and upvote themselves

    correct?

    $0.37
    • Past Payouts $0.37
    • - Author $0.37
    • - Curators $0.01
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     7 years ago 

    I don't think they know what they are talking about. There are many real issues to focus, what they bring is non-issue. If self upvote in any form is really an issue, free market will fix it. It is none of their business, everybody should run their blog the way they want. That is the point of having stakes with SP. These guys are just hating and trying to establish authocracy lol. They cry about self upvote, but don't have decency to upvote those who engage with them.

    [-]
     7 years ago (edited)

    I would like to point out:

    • after checking the FAQ, there is no official stance on this from steemit..
    • I think at some point, the FAQ should address it, instead of self-appointed shun list groups..
    $0.06
    • Past Payouts $0.06
    • - Author $0.05
    • - Curators $0.01
    2 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     7 years ago 

    I have been trying to learn more about how thing work as well. At this point my understanding is top 20 witnesses decide what changes will be applied in hard forks. However everybody gets to vote for witnesses. Ultimately they are the ones who make changes. High SP holders are already in loss because they don't get 90-100% interest on their SP as it was originally. It is very small now. Why would anybody tigh up their steem in SP, if they cannot use on themselves as well. So, this is a failed campaign. In my opinion it goes against basic principles of steem.

    [-]
     7 years ago 

    well said!
    obvious!
    couldn't agree more!
    what motivation to invest?!
    it's the other side of the coin, it must b considered very seriously...

    $4.79
    • Past Payouts $4.79
    • - Author $4.78
    • - Curators $0.00
    2 votes
    Reply