I'm a strong supporter of steemsports but I can't agree that @noisy is 'robbing' anyone of pay. Everyone has votes to use and if @noisy feels these posts are harmful it is his prerogative to downvote them (using up his valuable vote power in the process), and reallocate a portion of the rewards to other posts whose authors are, in general, no less deserving.

I would prefer that @noisy recognize that value that steemsports is bringing to the platform, but ultimately disagreements on opinion are okay too. Authors earn rewards when a consensus of the voters supports what they are doing, and in forming that consensus @noisy's subjective opinion is as valuable as any other. If everyone agreed all the time, we wouldn't need voting.

I agree with the comments about content organization of course.