You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Stake-based versus vote-based elections - an analysis toolkit

in #steemstem6 years ago
  • Please add an open source license to the repository
  • From this be allocated to different votes I think you meant be allocated two different votes
  • Please make smaller commits to allow for separation of concerns.
  • What are the future plans for this project?

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.


Need help? Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]

Sort:  

Thank you for your review, @helo! Keep up the good work!

Hi @helo and sorry for the delayed answer. I am lost between all the accounts I manage... Thanks for the review. Here is a few answers to your comments:

  • The license has been added. Completely didn't pay attention to this and this is bad on my side :(
  • the typo has been fixed.
  • the commit idea is very good. One of my very bad practice is to handle large commits, which is not good for other people to follow (the fact that I often developed alone is the reason). I will (try to) keep that in mind, especially for the development of steemstem.io.
  • the future plans are unclear, as it depends on the steemalliance path. One of the point is to setup a mechanism yielding the election of a foundation for Steem. A working group was elected and studying this election will help us on what to do and what not to do in the future. This script is supposed to provide some tools for this study (and has been asked along these lines).