You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My accounts are on the Hive blacklist
yeah somebody set the rules for the if then mechanism...
and this dude put him on the blacklist...
The if then mechanism is about picking lel. Same as select from where and every other mechanism where you set parameters which filters data.
This was dumb decision.
He is totally right with every word he is saying.
Maybe because I took part in de-escalating the situation and therefore voted for both sides
This is how a "real witness" should have handled.
I respectfully disagree in that voting for accounts actively sybil attacking the chain dramatically decreases the security of the chain as far as DPoS is designed. Witnesses who understand this should not support sock puppets.
That said, I don't agree with how this was decided. I tried to change minds and said it would be a black spot on the beginning of this chain. Unfortunately I was unable to convince those involved to take a different approach and just focus on the Steemit ninja-mined stake.
I disagree. It was part of an attack. I think @steemchiller is the model of what a Steemian should be, but actively supporting such an attack goes a step beyond saying that he was in the right to do so. What he should have done (if he didn't support centralization) is to vote for witnesses whom he believed in, even if it excluded all of the top witnesses who supported the softfork. I could even see voting for a single sock, but not 4.
That being said, mistakes are made and if anyone deserves latitude, I think Steemchiller does. He is upstanding and moral.
A witness should do the best for the community and this is NOT working against justinsun.
A compromise and more good communication would have been the right way.
The Problem with the ninja mine stack should have been resolved through discussions.
Sun is a big investor with a valuable network and this is something steem needs, a witness should have tried everything to generate added value out of this partnership instead of doing aggressive forks without communication.
this wasnt done.
PS: with 4 witnesses in the top positions you can not decide by your one, so their was a chance of kickstarting communication between sun and community witnesses.
Of course i understand your points, but the goal of a witness should be to give us steemians (their voters) the best results in form of steem as a product for users and steem as an investor. This goes by partnerships and onboarding new users due to marketing and an technological outstanding product, which needs money which for example sun has.
I agree, but I do feel they made a lot of attempts to contact them before the soft fork. And even after. They didn't without any connection. They announced it was temporary and expressed the desire to communicate. Before the softfork, the only communications coming from the tron side were that a token swap was going to happen on a timeline, and if the swap wasn't done, that your Steem would "turn into nothing". There was also the deal with Justin using tron Genesis tokens in voting which he wasn't supposed to do.
So with all that going in and the combination of no other communication, I can understand why they took that action. I may feel they went a little too far by implementing a total freeze, but that was also mitigated somewhat by the public declaration of it being temporary.
From that point, it went downhill.