This is written based on my experience in Quebec. If you read this, wherever else you may be living, the local charter of human rights most certainly recognizes the human right to the person's surety and/or security. Just replace any occurrence of the word SURETY below with the word SECURITY and it'll work just the same.
It's your fundamental right not to be a public debt slave.

Original French version :
https://steemit.com/surety/@willbed/revenu-quebec-et-le-respect-des-droits-fondamentaux

You possibly know that the Quebec Revenue Agency, the government and all parasitic organizations which allow for corruption to exist and for bloodsuckers to live at the expense of good honest men and women by using them as financial slaves, they have given me, over the past few years, all the good reasons to despise them.

You may also know that I no longer VOLUNTARILY PAY the Quebec Revenue Agency.
If they want MONEY from my PERSON, they have to STEAL it !
I simply cannot ACCEPT to VOLUNTARILY contribute to this parasitic system.
I refuse to finance this corruption.

And the IMPORTANT thing is, it's not like I'm doing anything ILLEGAL or WRONG by refusing to buy back those public debts !

You see, here in Québec, every HUMAN BEING has the RIGHT to his/her PERSON'S SURETY...
Ad LEGALLY, a SURETY's job is to settle / pay / discharge debts.

In Québec, that FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT is one of those which supercede ALL OTHER LAWS, whether parasites like it or not...
It's not my FAULT... I'm not the one who made that up... IT'S WRITTEN ! IT'S THE LAW !

So, if ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT to that SURETY, not only am I not doing anything WRONG by DEMANDING they RESPECT that RIGHT, it would even be stupid for ME not to want to have this RIGHT RESPECTED now that I KNOW what it means...

So I'm posting this here because it seems all the info required to help anyone interested in learning about what I'm doing can be found in this recent communication which was addressed to the parasites at the Quebec Revenue Agency, and to a few others as a COURTESY.

Feel free to read, and if you have questions, just ask.
I'll try answer them to the best of my knowledge.

(ADDRESS)
Québec, August 22nd, 2016
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - WITHOUT PREJUDICE

REVENU QUEBEC - Christiane Laforest, Direction générale du recouvrement
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN129229716CA
4, Place Laval, bureau 150-F, Laval QC H7N5Y3

REVENU QUEBEC - André Larivière, Directeur du contentieux fiscal et civil à REVENU QUÉBEC
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN129229720CA
3800 rue de Marly, Dépôt 5-2-8, Québec QC G1X 4A5

UPAC - Att : Robert Lafrenière
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN129229733CA
600, rue Follum, UA8010, Montréal QCH2K3L6

LIEUTENANT COLONEL ROB DELANEY - National defense - Canadian Forces Provost Marshall
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN129229747CA
2200 Walkley Road, Ottawa ON K1A0K2

BY EMAIL (August 26th, 2016) :
Ariane Mignolet, Directrice générale des affaires juridiques et parlementaires à l'Assemblée nationale
amignolet@assnat.qc.ca
Stéphanie Vallée, Minister of justice
ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca
Carlos Leitao, Minister of finances
cabinet@revenuquebec.ca
L'honorable J. Michel Doyon, Bureau du Lieutenant gouverneur
blg@mce.gouv.qc.ca
Madame Geneviève Routhier, Directeur de l'état civil
genevieve.routhier@dec.gouv.qc.ca

SUBJET : The RESPECT, by REVENU QUÉBEC and/or their AGENT Christiane Laforest, of the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT of every HUMAN BEING to his/her PERSON'S SURETY.

Enclosed : Your letters dated August 10th, 2016 - CORRECTED / UNACCEPTABLE

INTERPRETATION
The following definitions apply to this communication.
"I" and/or "me" : includes ME, the MAN ; and EXCLUDE the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME).
"my" and/or "mine" : to ME, the MAN ; and NOT to the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME).

Madame Laforest,

I am the MAN who has the RIGHT to the PERSON named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME)'s SURETY which has the inscription # 119XX04XXXXXX (See birth certificate).

FOR MANY MONTHS NOW, I've been DEMANDING that
If that SURETY, to which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT
may do what a SURETY must LEGALLY do,
YOU MAKE SURE that the RIGHTS
which constitute the FUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE, which have been ENACTED by Her Majesty with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec, in the Charter of human rights and freedoms, the FUNDAMENTAL LAW which supercedes ALL OTHER ACTS in Québec,
are RESPECTED by EVERYONE, starting with the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY,
and that the method which is RECOGNIZED and ACCEPTED for that SURETY, to which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT, to do what a SURETY must LEGALLY do, be disclosed
so that public debts addressed to the PERSON to which's SURETY ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT, can be settled and/or paid and/or discharged by that SURETY, in RESPECT of my RIGHTS.

or that

If that SURETY, to which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT, can NOT do what a SURETY must LEGALLY do
or if it's NOT TRUE, that ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT to that SURETY,
YOU DECLARE IT IN WRITING, within ten (10) days ;

TELL ME : Is that DEMAND so hard to UNDERSTAND ???
YOU KNOW that IGNORANCE of the LAW is NOT and excuse, don't YOU ?

That is why it seems YOU should pay CLOSE ATTENTION to the content of this communication and that YOU MAKE SURE that ALL the complete, clear and precise answers, which are REQUIRED from the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY, are given.

YOU have sent 2 letters, both dated August 10th, 2016, and addressed to "(FIRSTNAME LASTNAME)" and/or to "monsieur".
In YOUR first letter "Objet : ajout de frais de prise en charge", YOU seem to be informing "YOU" that administration fees have been charged to "YOU".
In YOUR second letter "Objet : Demande de paiement", YOU seem to be pretending that "YOU" could be owing money to the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY.

SO FIRST, TELL ME :

WHO and/or WHAT is and/or are "YOU"... That "YOU" to which YOU addressed those two (2) letters ?
Wouldn't YOU be referring to the PERSON named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME) ?
And if that were the case, wouldn't that PERSON be the PERSON to the SURETY of which ME, the MAN, has the RIGHT ?? YES or NO ??

NOW,

If, as YOU are pretending, "YOU"'s account has indeed been examined, and if that examination of "YOU"'s account which YOU are pretending YOU have done was indeed done with a MINIMUM OF ATTENTION AND RIGOR, YOU should ALREADY know that, as the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY has already been NOTICED numerous times, ME, the MAN, do NOT ACCEPT anyone addressing ME using "VOUS" and/or a NAME DERIVED FROM A PUBLIC DOCUMENT and/or terms such as "mister" and/or any other COURTESY which could be used to attribute the PERSONNALITY and/or SURETY to ME, the MAN who has the RIGHT to the SURETY of the PERSON named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME). Doing so would give me all the good reasons to believe that YOUR INTENTIONS are to VIOLATE my RIGHTS.

So I have good reasons to believe YOU have addressed those two (2) letters to the PERSON to the SURETY of which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT..

Moreover, if, as you seem to be pretending, "YOU"'s account has been examined,
YOU should also know that the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY still has NOT answered the questions and/or demands which they have received in regards to the account of the PERSON to which's SURETY me, the MAN, have the RIGHT to
and YOU should also know that the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY and/or its AGENTS are the ONLY ones that should be blamed for any delay with the PERSON to the SURETY of which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT's account, because of NEGLIGEANCE and/or REFUSAL and/or BAD FAITH from YOU and/or the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY.

If you were to ignore and/or NOT UNDERSTAND and/or if YOU were to NOT have the COMPETENCE and/or AUTHORITY to answer my questions and/or demands, you should hand that file over to an AGENT which is COMPETENT AND AUTHORIZED to give those answers.

I have good reasons to believe that
André Larivière, Directeur du contentieux fiscal et civil à REVENU QUÉBEC and/or
Carlos Leitao, Minister des finances, and/or
Stéphanie Vallée, Minister de la justice, and/or
Reno Bernier, Directeur de l'état civil, et/ou Geneviève Routhier, Orientation juridictionnelles au Directeur de l'état civil and/or
Ariane Mignolet, Directrice générale des affaires juridiques et parlementaires à l'Assemblée nationale and/or
L'honorable J. Michel Doyon, Lieutenant gouverneur
have the knowledge and competences required to give those answers and it would therefore seem reasonnable for YOU to contact them and/or YOU insist for them to give those answers, with honor, in RESPECT with their oath of office, because whatever YOU may seem to be believing, NONE OF YOU is paid to VIOLATE the RIGHTS which constitute the FUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE and/or to VIOLATE THE LAW.

I wish to draw YOUR attention to the fact that the level of ignorance and/or negligeance and/or bad faith which the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY'S AGENTS have demonstrated in my PERSON's file over the past few months is absolutely UNACCEPTABLE and seems more and more HOSTILE.

YOU probably understand that YOU, QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY AGENTS, MUST RESPECT the law, and YOU MUST answer questions and/or demands which have been addressed to YOU in regards to YOUR RESPECT of the RIGHTS which have been ENACTED by Her Majesty, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec.

As far as I know, good honest MEN and WOMEN are NOT YOUR SLAVES and are NOT SLAVES of the CORRUPTION whch we all KNOW exists in Quebec.
If I were to be WRONG thinking so, and YOU were to pretend that good honest MEN and WOMEN are, in fact, SLAVES, then at least HAVE THE ARROGANCE TO DECLARE IT, in writing, within ten (10) days.

In YOUR first letter "Objet : ajout de frais de prise en charge", YOU seem to be referring to the "Tax administration act" and/or the "Law".
In YOUR second letter "Objet : Demande de paiement", YOU seem to be referring to "one or many fiscal laws".

TELL ME, which "laws" do YOU seem to actually be referring to ??

AND TELL ME, that and/or those "laws" to which you seem to be referring to, would they have precedence over the Charter of human rights and freedoms ??
YOU know, that FUNDAMENTAL LAW, ENACTED by Her Majesty, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec, which constitute the FUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE and which has precedence over ALL OTHER LAW IN QUEBEC and which RECOGNIZES the RIGHT of each human being to HIS/HER PERSON'S SURETY ??

Because ignorance is NOT an excuse, YOU can refer to the preamble and to articles 1 and 52 of the Charter or rights and freedoms.

Indeed, I have good reasons to believe that any law(s) to which YOU may be referring to does NOT have precedence over the Charter of human rights and freedoms nor over the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which are RECOGNISED and ENACTED therein.
I also have good reasons to believe that YOU MUST RESPECT THOSE RIGHTS, no matter what other "laws" may provide for, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.

If I am WRONG and if any of those "laws" to which you seem to be referring to were to actually have precedence over the Charter of rights and freedoms and over the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which are RECOGNIZED and ENACTED therein, YOU just have to PROVE it by referring to any specific article of any law you may be referring to that would provide for that "law" to have precedence over the Charter of rights and freedoms and I PROMISE I will stop demanding from YOU to RESPECT the RIGHTS which are RECOGNIZED and ENACTED in the Charter, starting with MY RIGHT to the PERSON's SURETY.

But if I'm RIGHT and those "laws" YOU may be referring to DO NOT have precedence over the Charter and/or the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which are RECOGNIZED and ENACTED therein, YOU should RECOGNIZE and RESPECT those RIGHTS, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, and RESPECTING those RIGHTS begins with ANSWERING my questions and/or demands in regards to those RIGHTS.

UNDERSTAND that I have NO INTENTION to let YOU IGNORE and/or NEGLECT and/or VIOLATE my RIGHTS and/or the FUNDAMENTAL LAW and/or Her Majesty's DECREES, unless YOU first explicitely declare ME YOUR SLAVE.

TELL ME, Madame Laforest, are YOU NOT aware of the high level of corruption which exists and allows for parasites to benefit and/or abuse of good honest MEN and WOMEN ? YES or NO ?

TELL ME, Madame Laforest, are YOU ENDORSING all that corruption which exists in Quebec and which we've all been witnessing for quite a few years already ? YES or NO ?

TELL ME, Madame Laforest, don't YOU agree that REFUSING to buy back all those debts which exist because of corruption and/or reckless spending and/or compound interests, is reasonnable ? YES or NO ?

TELL ME, Madame Laforest, if good honest MEN and WOMEN were to be FORCED to PAY for that corruption and/or those abuses and/or that FRAUD and/or that THEFT, wouldn't it be SLAVERY ? YES or NO ?

It seems to be the very reason why every HUMAN BEING has the RIGHT to his/her PERSON's SURETY, and because it still seems reasonnable to believe that ME, the MAN, I have the RIGHT to that SURETY, it seems just as reasonnable to demand from the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY to stop acting with negligeance and/or bad faith and to provide the required answers to my questions and/or demands so that the SURETY to which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT, of the PERSON I POSSESS, can be allowed to do, with the public debts which the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY addresses to that PERSON, what a SURETY is LEGALLY supposed to do.

UNDERSTAND THAT :

CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that Her Majest enacted, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec, in the Charter of human rights and freedoms, that each human being has the RIGHT to his/her PERSON's SURETY ;
REF: http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12
(See article 1)

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that the Charter of human rights and freedoms is still effective and/or in force ;

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that no provision of any Act, even subsequent to the Charter, may derogate from sections 1 to 38, except so far as provided by those sections, unless such Act expressly states that it applies despite the Charter.
REF: http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12
(See article 52)

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that Québec is the only province – and the only North-American jurisdiction – to have included economic and social rights in a FUNDAMENTAL LAW, the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, which TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER LAWS. ;
REF: http://www.cdpdj.qc.ca/en/droits-de-la-personne/vos-droits/Pages/des.aspx
(See "Did you know ?" box)

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that the respect for the dignity of human beings, equality of women and men, and RECOGNITION of their RIGHTS and freedoms constitute the FOUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE ;
REF: http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cs/C-12
(See preamble)

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY must RECOGNIZE and RESPECT those RIGHTS which were ENACTED in the Charter of human rights and freedoms ;

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that the PERSON which ME, the MAN, POSSESS, has a SURETY ;

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that, LEGALLY, a SURETY is "An individual who undertakes an obligation to pay a sum of money or to perform some duty or promise for another in the event that person fails to act." ;
REF: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/surety
REF: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/security

AND CONSIDERING THAT it still seems to be TRUE that the LEGAL definition of the word SURETY should apply to this word as used in that FUNDAMENTAL LAW ;

AND CONSIDERING THAT the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY received and saved and/or ignored and/or refused to recognize and/or to negotiate and/or present to payment the bills of exchange which were delivered during the past few months as the funds and/or money they LEGALLY are, in RESPECT with the Bills of exchange act and the Financial administration act ;

AND CONSIDERING THAT I now I good reasons to believe that I CANNOT TRUST the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY and/or their AGENTS to RESPECT the Bills of exchange act NOR the Financial administration act NOR the RIGHTS which were ENACTED by Her Majesty, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec, in Quebec's FUNDAMENTAL LAW, the Charter of human rights and freedoms ;

AND CONSIDERING YOU STILL MUST RESPECT THOSE RIGHTS ;

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND AND YOU GIVE ME NO OTHER CHOICE BUT TO DEMAND,
ONCE AGAIN, THAT YOU ANSWER :

1 - Does the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT the Charter of human rights and freedoms and the RIGHTS which are ENACTED therein, at Article 1 ? YES or NO ?

IF THE QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY DOES NOT RECOGNIZE AND/OR DOES NOT RESPECT THE CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND/OR THE RIGHTS WHICH ARE ENACTED THEREIN, AT ARTICLE 1, I WISH YOU TRANSMIT, WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS, A WRITTEN DECLARATION STATING SO.

IF THE QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY DOES RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT THE CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND THE RIGHTS WHICH ARE ENACTED THEREIN, AT ARTICLE 1, THIS WOULD THEREFORE MEAN THAT THE QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY DOES RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT THE HUMAN RIGHT TO HIS/HER PERSON'S SURETY,

AND I WOULD CONSEQUENTLY WISH YOU DISCLOSE :

2 - Can this SURETY, to which ME, the MAN, have the RIGHT, do what a SURETY must LEGALLY do, and settle and/or pay and/or discharge public debts which are adressed, by the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY, to the PERSON to which's SURETY ME, the MAN, I have the RIGHT to ? YES or NO ?

IF THAT SURETY, TO WHICH ME, THE MAN, HAVE THE RIGHT TO, CAN EFFECTIVELY DO WHAT A SURETY MUST LEGALLY DO, I WISH THAT SURETY DOES WHAT A SURETY MUST LEGALLY DO AND I WISH YOU DISCLOSE :

• What is the method recognized and accepted by the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY, for public debts, which are addressed by the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY to the PERSON to which's SURETY ME, the MAN, I have the RIGHT, to be settled and/or paid and/or discharged by that SURETY, in RESPECT with my RIGHTS ?

AND IF THAT SURETY CAN NOT DO WHAT A SURETY MUST LEGALLY DO, I WISH YOU DECLARE, IN WRITING WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS, THAT EITHER

• that SURETY can NOT do what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY DO ;
• or
• the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY does NOT ACCEPT fom this SURETY to do what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do ;
• or
• the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY does NOT RECOGNIZE my RIGHT to that SURETY ;
• or
• the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY does NOT RESPECT my RIGHT to that SURETY ;
• or
• ME, the MAN, does NOT have the RIGHT to that SURETY ;
• or
• that SURETY does NOT EXIST ;
• or
• ME, the MAN, am a SLAVE.

And if ME, the MAN, am a SLAVE, I wish you disclose, within ten (10) days, WHO and/or WHAT am I a SLAVE of ???

SO MAKE SURE that the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY stops being RESPONSIBLE for all the wasted time and/or delays in regards to this account
and STOP ADDING fees and/or interests and/or penalties to this account, because of YOUR NEGLIGEANCE and/or IGNORANCE and/or BAD FAITH
and PROVE that YOUR INTENTIONS are NOT HOSTILE by providing, within ten (10) days, ALL the required answers to all the legitimate questions and/or demands which were addressed to YOU in regards to this account.

TELL ME, Madame Laforest, the Charter of human rights and freedoms having precedence over all other laws, if YOU and/or the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY were to REFUSE to provide those answers and/or if YOU and/or the QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY were to REFUSE to RESPECT the Charter of human rights and freedoms, BY WHAT AUTHORITY WOULD YOU EVEN PRETEND THAT YOU COULD ENFORCE ANY OTHER LAW / ACT / CODE / STATUTE to WHOEVER ???

AND TELL ME, Madame Laforest, the Charter of human rights and freedoms having precedence over all other laws, if YOUR INTENTION and/or the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY's INTENTION were to REFUSE to either RECOGNIZE and/or RESPECT the Charter of human rights and freedoms and the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS which are ENACTED therein, would YOU NOT be just a gang of ACCOMPLICES serving PARASITE FRAUDSTERS and/or THIEVES and/or wouldn't YOU, QUEBEC REVENU AGENCY AGENTS, be PARASITES YOURSELVES ???

And so I count on YOUR collaboration, Madame Laforest, to MAKE SURE that ALL the CLEAR, PRECISE and COMPLETE REQUIRED ANSWERS, which have been addressed to the QUEBEC REVENUE AGENCY in regards to this account, are provided, in writing, within ten (10) days, NO MATTER BY WHO, so that JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE can be PRESERVED in Québec.

I REPEAT : If ME and/or anyone else has ever given YOU any reason to believe that I could be an "employee" and/or an "agent" and/or an "officer" and/or "Her Majesty" and/or "an organization" and/or "the PERSON named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME)" and/or a "slave", that would be a MISTAKE, and please forgive ME.

Also, I wish to remind YOU that I wish that neither YOU nor ANYONE ELSE ever address ME using words such as "Mister"; as I am NOT YOUR "mister" nor YOUR "subordinate", and I am NOT an AGENT of the state ; and I wish that neither YOU nor ANYONE ELSE ever address ME with the use of "VOUS" and/or "YOTRE" and/or "VOS" ; as I am NOT plural, and I am NOT an ORGANIZATION, and I am NOT the PERSON named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME), and I am NOT SURETY for that PERSON and I do NOT ACCEPT from ANYONE to address ME as such.

I do NOT ACCEPT from ANYONE to address ME using a NAME derived from ANY PUBLIC DOCUMENT.
I do NOT ACCEPT COURTESIES.

If YOU were to use "VOUS" in any of YOUR future communications, maybe pretending using "VOUS" to be polite and/or for any other reason, I would respectfully ask YOU to clearly precise, WHO would you be addressing as such :
would it be ME, the MAN ; or would it be the PERSON to which's SURETY I have the RIGHT to ??

And if YOU were to pretend YOU'd be addressing ME as such, TELL ME by what authority would you be trying to attribute PERSONNALITY and/or SURETY to ME in this matter, if that were to be YOUR INTENTION ?

YOU can say "tu" and/or "Will" and/or "administrator" when YOU talk to ME.

YOU CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND that if anyone were to give anyone and/or make me give anyone reasons to believe that ME, the MAN, could be a PERSON and/or a LEGAL ENTITY and/or SURETY in that matter, that would resemble bad faith and/or a conspiracy and/or fraud in regards to my RIGHTS.

And so it is VERY IMPORTANT that any presumption and/or confusion is avoided by YOU about this.
With respect, honor, dignity and integrity,

By : _ _ _ _ _ (scribble) _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Sole Authorized Administrator for the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named (FIRSTNAME LASTNAME) which's inscription number is 119XX04XXXXXX
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED