You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Its time for STINC to actually support communities on this platform.
Certainly good points.
But in the same vein, the big accounts are endorsing reward hogging individuals whom generally (not all of course) look after themselves rather than the greater good.
And of course, all those other countries.
It may be the case that the delegator requires a level of "professionalism" within the group, a code of conduct to ensure quality is rewarded for fear of loosing delegation.
Having someone listen and be prepared to discuss is the main goal here.
Very true, and discussion is the first step. It would be nice to see some more big players fostering growth throughout the whole community ecosystem. There will have to be some sort of code of conduct and due diligence to do to make it work.
There is also the aspect of delegating away your influence. I'm not sure how it works with Witness votes, but by delegating too much away, and having very little "net" vests left with which to vote could be a disincentive for those big accounts to delegate (unless your "native SP" is what counts for those votes - which I think is the way it should work for Witness Votes - perhaps it already does??).