Lions in cages
The other day a family member of mine said that we shouldn't be teaching our daughter so much at home like we do, otherwise she will be bored at school and not fit in with the other kids. They seemed to be under the impression that when we teach our daughter we have some kind of classroom routine where we make her do things like, his parents did to them. People of course make assumptions based on their own experience and project it onto others as if no one can do different to what happened to or than what they did.
What is interesting is even at this early stage people see a child who is advanced (in their opinion) as some kind of potential problem child in the future because they aren't going to fit in with all the other kids, they aren't going to be average. Our daughter is advanced in her language skills and enjoys the games we play that support it but it was never our intention to focus on language development, she chose it.
The person that criticized our parenting style said that it is us who puts these things in front of her. I agree. We are products of our environment and I do not think that it is any surprise that our daughter developed enjoying language and music because since she was born we have sung to her, read and told stories and spoken to her in much the same way we would speak to an adult. She has been surrounded her entire life by quality language in both Finnish and English (she is dual mother tongue) so as children do, she replicates and mirrors her surroundings.
Children are sponges and soak so much information in, no matter what that information is. For example, the day I started kindergarten was the first time I was called the N-word and I can't imagine many parents explicitly teaching it to their children and explaining usage and context but, there it was from a group of 4 year olds who didn't know each other previously. Specific language is by nurture, not nature.
This is why I am concerned by surrounding young children with so much engineered and designed content made specifically for them. Do we really know what music helps them develop a good ear or understanding or, are we just offering them musical crack? The games designed is like giving a ball to a lion and then expecting it to learn how to hunt and survive in the wild. Sure, it gets exercise but is it the kind of exercise that encourages it to be in its best form?
Children aren't lions in lifelong cages though, they are going to be released into the wild and will have to fend for themselves. If their entire childhood experience is one of technical engineering designed to cater to their every need, what happens when their needs aren't met?
I am not one of those people who has a lot of faith in centralized education systems and it is dropping even further as they are satisfying the future needs of students less and less each day. I hope my daughter is bored at school. I hope that she is so bored that she realizes how ridiculous the celebration of average and preparation to be employees in jobs that won't exist in 20 years that institutional education largely is, that she will find out what she actually wants to do with her life.
There is nothing wrong with being bored unless the expectation is that someone has to provide entertainment. That is how I see much of what is going on with children these days, they are being provided entertainment under the guise that it has lifelong skill value and gives them a competitive edge when in fact, all are getting the same and, there is very little space for imagination to develop. Rather than let kids be bored enough that they go out and play and learn to hunt for themselves, we hand them a device to take their mind off the boredom - as long as they are out of our way so we can do the same.
We aren't creating strong, expressive, creative, talented humans, we are engineering caged lions who have nothing to do unless a ball is thrown into their enclosure. We are designing consumers who can't think for themselves, the words they have are quotes from movies and their humor is a meme taken from the internet. For those who are children now, this is all most of them have ever been surrounded with, technology that replaces the need for having a personality to connect with others.
We don't teach our daughter anything although she learns a lot. We have pencils and paper on the table. There are small piles of books around our apartment. A box of Lego. Most importantly though is, we give her space to explore her surroundings, we answer her questions with questions so she thinks it through, we let her help with the household chores, we talk with her constantly, hug her often, discuss all manner of topics she is interested in and explain to the best of our ability how various things work.
She is very, very curious. There is no time to be bored when there is always something interesting to discover and, for the creative of mind, there is discovery to be made in the most mundane of surroundings. Unfortunately, kids are too attached to their screens to see the world around them these days and they may never know what they are missing but, know they will feel that something is missing. They just likely won't have the personal tools to discover what it may be.
Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Just do what you're doing. She's a good kid...
P.s. You said Finnish and English...You must have forgotten I taught her some Australian as well! 😉 She's a trilingual. (I think I just made that word up) 😐
Posted using Partiko Android
Australian is her secret weapon language
🤣
Posted using Partiko Android
It's troubling to know that even in Finland you have this issue. And Finland is one of the champions in education. So how much worse the situation is everywhere else?
Posted using Partiko Android
Finland is good at educating kids to do what they have always done. The unemployment rate in 20 somethings is still very high and the depression rates among children is increasing. I wonder what the goal of education is.
This is a very controversial topic, one of those issues human beings around the world have curiously agreed to self-inflict mediocrity.
I agree that kids should be raised to be
I think you are doing the right thing. The educational systems from K to college should be based on free inquiry and challenges to students’ potentials. I hate when all the elements involved (parents, relatives, church, community, faculty, authorities) agree on labeling the smart inquisitive students as "weird". They just reveal the system's self-imposed limitations, its hidden ideological agenda, which seems to be: make them as idiotic as possible so that they can be easily manipulable.
Children should be given all the motor and intellectual stimuli we can, they usually end up picking and choosing, and usually they choose well. It is the institutionalized imposition of tasks what warps their development.
Your daughter is super cute and she will be super smart, of course that'll scare many :)
School teaches whatever can have answers written in the back of the book, whatever is testable and is almost entirely memory based. It isn't about self-discovery, it is about conformity.
Children are now more active and curious ... I do not know if it will be because of the technological advances and all the daily running, but I'm telling you because when my niece was born 14 years ago the children were not as amazing as now ... my girl 2 years old always wants to know more and more ... the 8-year-old girl was always curious and very intelligent ... but Cami is much more curious, intrepid, and learns, even things and words that we still do not teach her ... That is a pride for us as parents, and wherever we go we are surprised with the things that she knows how to do or say ... I believe that wherever you live, they are alarmed by something that does not make sense ... they They should be alarmed if the girl does not learn anything ... If she learns in a spontaneous way and you are not forcing her I do not see the bad thing ... it's her passion to learn and you have to take advantage of that passion.
By the way, what is N-word??
In the future there are likely to be less chances for employment and higher competition. The children who can do something and are creative will have much better opportunities in life than those who can only consume the creations of others.
Ah, the N word is a derogatory name for black people.
Our daughter is free to do a lot and, also has responsibilities to take care of. Luckily, her memory is better than her parents :)
Public education is all about 'caged lions'. Bright kids are forced to endure boredom for 12 long years, until they forget the noble animal they were supposed to be. If you visit a Zoo, most animals have lost their will to live, bored out of their witts in their cages.
The Finnish school system is said to be the best in the world and, for the sake of your little girl, I hope it is. In most parts of the world, though, the focus is on taming the lions.
Speaking of odd things family members say - when I decided to homeschool my son, I was asked where will he learn obediance?
It is fine but limited yet people rely on it to service all requirements. They love to talk about how good the system is here yet, they don't look at the parts that say Finnish school kids are among the most stressed in the world. (at least in the PISA results a few years back)
lol. The state of the world.
Does she get the languages mixed up much? I read that in a dual-language household it helps when one parent only speaks to the child in one language, while the other parent only speaks to the child in the other language -- I don't know how effective this is.
Our daughter gets about 90% in Finnish so her Finnish is slightly stronger but she doesn't confuse them at all. My wife speaks to her in Finnish or English depending on if I am around and me mostly in English (my Finnish is not great). What we have done is differentiated by 'What mummy says/ what daddy says' but now she knows the difference and uses 'in Finnish/ in English'. She knows which books are which too.
My niece is bilingual too and used to confuse the languages until about 3 years of age, it is common.
Thanks for answering my question. I am always inspired by your willingness to engage with random commenters. 😊
No problem. Conversation for me is a big part of being a part of what is to come. In random and uncertainty is where most of the value resides in life :)
Our children probably also learn from our experiences as well which should help is determine their approach at learning. I often find myself wondering if she is learning the best way but does that way really exist? My parents had a more hands-off approach with me which help me learn from my surroundings and I see that in my daughter which has gotten me more comfortable with her progress so far... It will be interesting how it develops as she becomes more accessible to information around her!
Posted using Partiko iOS
I would assume that there is a genetic component to learning styles also. Is there a best way? I am not sure but one thing that I am going to be concentrating on is the skill o learning itself, rather than what is learned. That way, it is up to her what she puts in.
Ahaha actually this is quite normal for the first born children, most parents do all that and when the second child is born, they start to slack off on the whole adult language, reading books etc xD the second and other “newer” siblings are left to play/learn from the eldest kid.
I am the 4th child and I wasn't pushed to learn the piano and the like but, I was taught to read and write and was always told to find something to do if I ever mentioned being bored. Learning from older siblings generally means experimenting earlier than they did. Also, learning how not to get caught ;)