privex ... sounds more reliable than 'used to be nsa' or im a writer indeed
sounds like there's some kind of oscillating version of 'the' chain then , cant consider myself an expert on blockchain-tek , in the end it should correct since there can be only one version as you can only have one block fitting exactly between two others, there's no other way for a blockchain to exist (at least thats how i understood back in pre-history class) SO this sounds like it has an error margin and a calibration time
but what you're saying is it simply discards certain chunks to make sure, well no, b/c it cant have difference and so it cuts them out and the data goes into the void
...?
there must be some kind of patch for that then or people would have been reporting missing financial tx , that would be the first complaint ...
im afraid i dont know enough to speak about it in all fairness but even with a patch it means its an issue that would slow things down as it would need correction-after-the-fact
privex ... sounds more reliable than 'used to be nsa' or im a writer indeed
sounds like there's some kind of oscillating version of 'the' chain then , cant consider myself an expert on blockchain-tek , in the end it should correct since there can be only one version as you can only have one block fitting exactly between two others, there's no other way for a blockchain to exist (at least thats how i understood back in pre-history class) SO this sounds like it has an error margin and a calibration time
but what you're saying is it simply discards certain chunks to make sure, well no, b/c it cant have difference and so it cuts them out and the data goes into the void
...?
there must be some kind of patch for that then or people would have been reporting missing financial tx , that would be the first complaint ...
im afraid i dont know enough to speak about it in all fairness but even with a patch it means its an issue that would slow things down as it would need correction-after-the-fact
thanks for replying :) !!!!