I asked you why you thought a class warfare based argument would be convincing from the jump. That was another question you were unable to answer. You are better off being poor in America than wealthy in Cameroon. "Income inequality" is meaningless, especially without any context, like that figure provides.

Class warfare arguments like your are based on flawed premises and are essentially emotional arguments, is wealth a zero sum game?

Does a wealthy person having a lot of money mean there is less for you to make or prevent you from making money?