Not sure what happened to “journalistic integrity”...seems there was a time (perhaps myth) when reporters took pride in telling the “fair and balanced truth,” at least as well as they could...now you have to assume the bias of whatever you’re reading, and try and assemble some modicum of truth from the conglomeration of all sources.
While it may be true that ignorance in the age of information is a choice, it’s an easy one for anyone who expends their energy in the real world and has none left to wade through all the bullpuckey.
I doubt there ever was such a time.
Agreed, that’s why I allow that it was a myth.
As flippant as it may be, I deserve an upvote for the use of the word “bullpuckey” in a sentence...
There never was a journalistic integrity. There was only, ever, selling newspapers.
All the stories that i actually knew about, and then later read in the newspaper, well i... you would think the newspaper story was about something else that happened.
And that was on local stories where no one on the paper had any real dog in the fight.
Read Edward Barnays. 90% of what you see and hear is designed by a single group to manipulate your thought and emotions.
Look up Walter Kronkite saying how he worked for the CFR.
Look up Rotschildren thanking the New York Crimes for not printing anything so the FED could come into existence.
The deception has been going on that long.
And if you are looking for upvotes, you aren't going to see many here. Corbett usually doesn't come back and interact with his posts here.
Your reply brought to mind two quotes which I find quite apropos to the discussion at hand. The first, given by a journalist named John Swinton in 1884:
source: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Swinton
And the second, given by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to John Norvell in 1807:
source: https://www.loc.gov/resource/mtj1.038_0592_0594/?sp=2&st=text
YES! this.
Naw, was joking.
no, but I will give you one for making me laugh just now.