Weekly overview of the development category - Week 18, 2019
2019-04-26 15:00:00 UTC to 2019-05-03 15:00:00 UTC
This is a weekly, semi-automated post where I will show some statistics and graphs of the development category. It will also serve as a showcase for the staff picks and task requests that were made in the current week. If you have any suggestions or things you'd like to see in this post, then please let me know!
Previous posts
Top contribution(s)
KURE Community Curation App Update - Delete Posts and Comments, Transfer Ownership of Communities, and Eye Candy on Post Actions by @krnel
More useful Steem functionality have been developed to give greater control over your content, as well as a critical KURE community feature to further empower community management. You can now delete posts and comments on Steem, and on the KURE side, a very significant feature has been added: transferring ownership of a community you own.
Category summary
- There were 11 contributions of which 9 have a chance of being rewarded, or already were rewarded.
- The average score was 65.1 with an average reward of 18.9 STU from Utopian.
- The total reward from Utopian for development contributions this week (so far) is 151.0 STU.
- There were a total of 10 unique contributors in the category. Of those 1 were new contributors in the development category (@derwunner).
Score distribution in the development category
Number of contributions per weekday
On Sunday and Thursday there weren't any contributions at all, which is pretty sad to see. The start of the week did have some contributions however, but it's still a bit depressing that the number has dropped so low.
Average score, reward (STU) and time before review (hours) per week
Time before review is the number of hours between the creation of the post and the time it is reviewed by a moderator.
Unfortunately the average score of contributions is down from 74.9 to 65.1 this week. The average reward has also gone down from 23.0 STU to 18.9 STU. Of course with the average score also going down, this was to be expected. Lastly, the number of hours it takes for us to get to a contribution and review it (on average) has gone up slightly from 14.8 hours to 16.0 hours.
Number of contributions reviewed per week
As you can see, the weekly number of reviews is up from 10 to 11. Unfortunately despite the number of reviews being up compared to last week, the number of reviews in the last two weeks (21) is down from the two weeks prior (37).
Contributors
Number of unique contributors per week
With the number of reviews going up this week it's obviously not that surprising that the number of unique contributors has also gone up slightly from 9 to 10 this week, but of course this is still very cool nonetheless!
Most active contributor(s)
Well, since there were so few contributions everyone was equally active, so I thought I might as well list all of them here:
@krnel
@steemsoftware
@jpphotography
@to-the-sun
@quochuy
@eastmael
@holger80
@immanuel94
@derwunner
Moderators
- @helo reviewed 8 contributions with an average score of 67.8.
- @justyy reviewed 1 contribution with an average score of 43.0.
Number of reviews per weekday
As you can see, Wednesday was the day where we reviewed the most contributions in the development category. On Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday we didn't review as many contributions as usual. Of course one of these days was in the weekend, and so the most of us probably had other things to do.
Number of contributions reviewed per moderator
Average score given per moderator
Task request(s)
Fix and Optimize Existing Web Page by @prospector
Prospector is looking for someone who can help him out with the development of his website AssembleUtopia!
Also, if you think there is anything that can be worded more clearly, then please let me know!
This is a detailed report, as it is every week. It is well-illustrated, nicely written, and very informative. I am happy to see the little growth this week, and I am hoping to see 30, 40 contributions every week again.
Thank you for this report.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Thank you for your review, @tykee! Keep up the good work!
Hey, @amosbastian!
Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!
Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).
Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.
Vote for Utopian Witness!
Hi, @amosbastian!
You just got a 0.05% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
@amosbastian You have received a 100% upvote from @botreporter because this post did not use any bidbots and you have not used bidbots in the last 30 days!
Upvoting this comment will help keep this service running.