You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Fathers Talk About Their Unvaccinated Children and the Unbelievable Differences from Most Kids.
In my own experience @canadian-coconut with my 3 unvaccinated children (ages 12,9 & 5), they have had no ear infections, no need for antibiotics, and almost no pharmaceutical products. They do get colds and flues, but bounce back quickly. They have no chronic health conditions or allergies.
Why are anti-vax claims always so anecdotal? If vaccinations are dangerous or if they are necessary, it will be determined by large scale trials which have the ability to determine causal links. I have never seen an anti-vax article go into this side of the issue, which is the only side that can determine the truth.
There are large scale trials with alarming results. Many people don't hear about them because of the propaganda. There are many more tries that go too far (such as comparing vaccinated to completely unvaccinated). They refuse to perform them, we can all start to see clearly how that will turn out.
Can you link me to some?
It seems the CDC avoids that study (comparing unvaxxed to vaxxed) but looks like we can find at least one study outside of the US. I'm not enforcing any one source (you'll need to find your own) the information is all over. I am saying there is a common theme and consistently this criticism comes up.
Ref 1, 2
Demotruk your input to this reply is appreciated, @jamesc thank you!
I wrote this article a few months back, and it mentions 2 studies done on the overall health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated.
(a New Zealand study in 1992 & the Kiggs Study in Germany)
We Don't Vaccinate: How Sick has Become the New Normal
Oh, and when you put many "anecdotal" stories today it makes a "Case Study" which is indeed good scientific practice. I would not put much weight into a few stories here and there, but when thousands upon thousand of people are saying almost the exact same thing, that becomes evidence.
The VaxXed Team is carrying out a Case Study of sorts by travelling the country and gathering tons of vaccine injury stories, and now unvaccinated healthy stories from the people eager to share their accounts and finally be listened to and believed.
What do you think about the effect of self selection in collecting surveys?
@canadian-coconut hopefully Steem can do exactly that one day.
If you are looking for a products defects and ways to make it safer or more effective or more appealing to the public,
you have to survey or interview the people who have filed a complaint against the product or refuse to use your product, and take their concerns and experiences seriously.
Collecting these accounts are just one piece of the puzzle, but they are an important piece in seeing the whole picture.
It would be nice if independent non-biased scientists were provided the large amounts of money to fund a variety of types of studies that meets all scientific standards and look at things from all angles ... but until then we have to use our common sense based on what people's experiences are.
You may want to read & listen to the account of Nico LaHood, Criminal D.A. in Texas, and how he as the Lead Prosecutor, finds all these combined accounts of vaccine injury (including his own) to be "Strong Circumstancial Evidence" and that he would feel comfortable going before a jury with the evidence that he would win the case.
“VACCINES Can and Do Cause AUTISM” Declares Criminal D.A. in Texas, Nico LaHood
"Strong Circumstantial Evidence" is nothing to sneeze at. Especially when the ones guaranteeing you that all their pharmaceutical products are "safe" are the same ones profiting from them.