This is my point. You have a somewhat coherent philosophy, it just happens be to coherently delusional as a denial of reality. Many intelligent people have this same delusion as well, because it makes them feel better. Einstein was a socialist, he realized for it to work human nature would just have to be changed, and it naturally would result in mass slavery, but if people are fine being slaves then it could work. You have the same basic philosophy, that things would be fine if humans could be comfortable being slaves. William James thought that humans could replace war with civil service. Another delusion that didn't prevent WW1 or WW2. You see child sacrifice as just a personal preference, as you noted in your stance on abortion. You see murder as not anti-humanistic, as noted in your stance on Cain. You see mass enslavement and killing as not anti-humanistic, as noted in your stance on Marx. You make the case that humans won't use weapons so they shouldn't be given them, and you make the case that humans will use weapons so they shouldn't be given them. You can see here that it's not a type of reasoning, it's an ideological and even religious belief that you have that humans should be disarmed, and you'll use any possible reason to arrive at that conclusion. You make the case for disarming victims, making them easier victims. You can see how you still have that East German anti-humanistic philosophic idealism of creating victims and the trans-humanistic philosophy of changing human nature.