demonstrated by the date of the first strike on swb1 energy grid - socialdecoys
during 8 years, nato michael flynn could reinforce while shelling indiscriminately in dombass.
nothing
then smo
again, the same mindset prevailed...
and finally the switch "ah yes maybe"
stubbornness... the contrary of adapt overcome improvise, move forward.
it was like that.
the good news, progressively even the most fanatics in their hugo boss suits and various luxury cars, realize... yeah, without SMOers you get trashed away, by michael flynn, laughing, he will enjoy it, for his pensions and then feed childsexslaves to his plantation order.
the reality.
then you can mask it in memes and denial and all things.
you have a country or not.
step 2 defend it.
and not in the ways the enemy wants you to.
the core of the bush2 to monopolize for THEMSELVES ONLY asymmetrical warfare, the biggest con (even than 9.11), splendid as it worked.
they won't hesitate or through proxies to kill your kids, air strikes on the palaces etc, biowarfare, mindwarfare, what ever they find, while you want your soldiers to play " save private ryan " or mel gibson type of meme.
ridicule.
then there is a logic why iran had to deny the "russian advisors", iran energy shut down, beyond the cult of the "jeeews", not win win. the problem of the mindset.
again lower energy price, lower stuff too for energy producers.
win win.
always and only.
otherwise won't work
and due to our scale we win win for the stability for harmony peace and prosperity but not in an illusion : the scale to defend to china, present.
real. with the hope to be able to only train in news.
otherwise, nazguls arrive and roam and rule the battlefield, as they always end up doing the moment they arrive.
my point the inevitability of targeting the core through it's decoys. logic.
you can't do otherwise
why the bunker of berlin, the central one, HAD to be taken down.
and the reichstag
and the energy grid
and the manufacturing complex
and so on
and the rest,
otherwise = pipe dream.
a) peace win win co existence
b) your death.
and there the power of the YOUR SIDE, as it's YOUR SIDE, not our problem, as such you do what you want, what you accept from us or to us, the WIN WIN, the real win win. the idea to use force to impose on the other our win, not a win win, that is the "gun boat diplomacy" (alinsky inside again) and wrapping it under a "UNO" flag pumped by the lapdogs of RT, won't change that it's not a win win.
so to go back to the never defeated the Ta'AAAAHHHlibans when yes, (and if yes for us too) we get a pure WIN WIN ! total victory, 0 violence, only peace, lasting and sustainable, no subterfuge, force deceit or manipulation, "yes we would like to buy your tea" - "no we won't sell" excellent next trade item on the list. ahh yes, yes
so yes yes
win win
perfect
next item
you want to review previous one to a no now
excellent choice
and moving
by not attempting anything as it's their SIDE.
and we can relax and/or focus on the rejuvenation of china as such too new items line will appears and again asking them, yes/No, ahh how it works, ahahah !
why it works super well with the TaaAAHHHlibans, because they kill traitors. something they really don't like. so integrity on the other side is greatest, meaning the power or weight of their yes or no, final and THEIRS. top
easier
as our item list, so yuge, move on to the next line.
happy - happy
win win.
great
top
forward !
now the opposite
suckaz want to destroy us
q1 : who are the sukaz? not their decoy, DUH.
a1 : them
forward.
if they not dummies they put some layers before them
warfare warfare
and we get to them
and kill them
then surrounding generally does what it want, we may retreat to repack the whole
again they want to continue to their extermination
and it's over
tagged in the chronologies of warfare of china, as extinct. excellent and re-pivoting to the win win with the reasonable and integrist (who have integrity and deepness of their unity) to continue the win win.
simple
the problem : the sneaky bitchy of "michael flynn". but the day he will eat his own kids flesh, his whole conception of his perceived superior all domains he believe will be shattered one chew at a time. ironic for a man who wanted to rule china to end up forced to eat his own kids. you see the defeat.
YOU DON'T
can't accept
feed.
then, he will.
the wall of total hopelessness, absolute defeat. there will be nothing left of it. a shell.
and as we don't want to be a shell of them...
resaid : don't predate on china. you will wake apexing and get counter predation on you - the real you, not your decoys - social decoys if you want to be "kgb" fancy or russian academie of political science "look it's the text".