sensible subject
the term "war of aggression"
totally correct
to me,
culturally...
what is expressed
the aggression of course an expansion...
in the west, not clear, as everything is about domination of others...
why i would use more the term war of expansion...
expanding over china
deserved to be nuked, lose eras etc.
all gone
idea that is behind
you can't civilize the savages barbarian brainless, the "aggressives"
but to explain them as beasts, taht sides exist
possible
and that it's in the interests of their own existence to respect the one of CHINA
simply
or die.
to wish to explain them to not be aggressive (not refering japan)
wishfull thinking...
going against the nature of the beast...
but to japan notion of expansion
very clear.
at least once upon a time
otherwise
very true
"we are so peacefull"
while keeping stolen items.
disputing what isn't to be (daoyu)
supporting what is criminal (fujans)
etc...
serfing for the usa, the massons...
troubling celestial harmony has big consequences...
like the philipines, or the sk
them special
japan
but
the forward
the problem of the proxies
the "ursula's and kaya's lepen and co" of japan
my wishfull thinking...
that one day they liberate themselves
and find their just and righteous place in the orbit system
as a free sovereign independent nation doing what ever they want OVER and ONLY over their land...
in the era of the new china,
the japan and china both having opened up
then to another
remaining
clearly not the same
china rules china
japan japan
ideal.
at least a new way
from the closed japan for most...