RE: History, as a science, vs the psyop, cover up and decoys of the occupiers and enemies, logic they will do that...
certainly big errors to discredit, the fundamentals then to pass as wrong as the discredit.
again for US irrelevant, as THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION OF CHINA is a story older than moses almost :) we had a problem, the imperial feodalism allowing foreign invasion, then those who sought that by adopting a set of systems to improve would then be the rulers, ay... transitions to transition raise of Comrade CHAIRMAND DENG XIAOPING, with teh correct answer for more forward !
the rest is history, through the lies the errors, the problems the fallacies to find the new ones along the march forward to overcome, again and again as long as there is the universe... one day, who knows ^^ meanwhile... step by step through all things. the motion of the march forward, we move, errors of course but with motion forward, overcome, always.
who made this new china? marx ? ccp? or all the chinese people forwarding? ah... who rules CCP ? ah.. marx? ahahaha. no. Unity. and those who seek and they will with new dubious theories, have today no chances... again with the correct answer, there is no fear of any, specially those who scream, "don't study, don't question, we have the truth"... the first why :), then a lie... and a path of darkness start. anyway.
my important to keep the origin, anyway as maybe comrade elai? lai? or another big general, yuge, the red book. ahhh.. ah we dared again? ahahah.
meaning, they arrive with their psypowers, all well organized, and before they understand, absorbed, remade, exploited, throughed, and still moving forward, they are stuck behind... "how did they do that" ? the arts :) vs the trash who got a nice scam, once.
my point, no rejections of the past and the understanding it... again lead to this incredible video of the care of the Chairman of the whole PRC toward among the weakest and the furthest from all the powers of this republic.
today they have news scams, i am sure :) which i am in, certainly in the sense of unaware of them. meaning i am sure happy with the transition of deng xiaoping... still keeping the essence of the first the ideals, prosperity, harmony, sovereignty, peace, security, safety, ecological sound, to really "magnificent" china and not as an ironic. yes it's way BIGGER than japan, but magnficient is too possible in the large scale project of such a country... meaning a giga damn more impressive, at least first than the beauty of small peace canal under a cannopy of trees... yuge ! it's china too, as both exist, but not at the same place :).
china =/ japan.