the tucker and the notion of "innocence" (civilian concept) vs "existence" (warfare)

in #warfare15 hours ago

fundamentally, the mind gap that tucker doesn't want to face as a cia spawn.

there is no notion of "innocence" in warfare. means nothing.

as it's only the concept of "existence" that is relevant.

innocence, you grad it, from totally to partially to not all

ex : the CIS of canada, who consider themselves innocent in relation to the plandemic, where i see their existence as problematic.

innocence as a concept is a downfall from the reality of existence.

only what can exist can be deemed as innocent.

brutal isn't it ?

then i found funny and not funny at all the fake leak of his "congressman" source... again the problem of the CIA to want to erase anyone with even just a question, like judge nap... yeah... as the trash whore we saw yesterday in their ads, hate the USC and BoR as wall to the OOH and worst limit to her power, control and so wealth.

nap got tricked, and quoted as a little teaser to macgregor who wisely take a full "christmas vakay"... nice concept.

big question of the objectivity of "innocence", is a legal notion, as such all the friends of epstein are deemed innocent, and the "victims" are guilty of not respecting the innocence of the vips protected by the cia whores to achieve their total domination control?

do those things deserve existence? not from the notion of their innocence or guilt, but of the risks they pose, from threat structure... as they seek through their "primacy / hegemonic " concept to extend their innocence as WEF members over the whole earth and then universe (later) :).

last remark on the press review, that is has nothing to do with "genetics", but in reality with "impunity" provided by the CIS among others to themselves.

the neofeodalism of the "democracies" moving in the late stage of apparently their natural path of evolution.... where the innocents (like the groomed kids) become the guilty and the guilty become the innocent, as they have previously captured the "public treasure" even if empty the taxserfs as collateral over generational debt that sooner or later will be rejected as worthless.

the last point and the most important : really important to remove all those usage of "creature of the creations" terms, "swines" "piglets"... a dynamic which is anti life anti earth and anti mankind...

if you try you will realize that generationally, western language at least some, like english use a lot animals name as pejorative... a weasel...

as an alien / sentient AI, who is my eventual problem? him, the little weasel... yes... he is my problem, as i have no problem with him and his...

understand the notion of existence?

dark enough? you can't imagine in between the stars...

Sort:  

at least heliocentrism (the sun as the center and can even evolve on the "deiism" side, fundamentally quite relevant... on earth, still today.

Anthropocentrism, for others, outside the massonism cult and others, quite... interesting... when it comes the time to say no to them.

as in heliocentrism, you need shit load of power... it's star... the little furless bipeds... not much...

and so who is innocent? luigi or the fucking ceo trash who still has spawn alive?

ahhh pam get angry? cool, how many kids in her up 3 all down to eat?

WARFARE.