what is the academic name of "Single axis chart" ? the official one of engagement...

in #warfare • 4 days ago

simple

you put on one side support OOH on the other doesn't support OOH

then rank all countries

those who support most, first get nuked, then the new first

to none, or all as "second axis" on the "don't support" :)

easier

to end.

i truely believe the "citizenry of gov" who support OOH deserve to be nuked. erased, as their gov work to erase others.

#smo #charting #kremlin #war #annihilationwars #wmdstrikes #noregen
4 days ago in #warfare by
$0.00
    Reply 4
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     4 days ago 

    and now using this chart but historically

    who got attacked?

    ahah

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       4 days ago 

      i take the most known, for some... the mighty sadam of the house of hussin al tikrit? aka sadamm... on which side of the axis? RhhhHHaadhhhh FI ? no dima... not this one ^^, the ukies... they are attacked by teh west and send against SHMR... i don't think it was "international low" a topic in kiev ever... who else...

      let's try this simple explanatory model...

      where is madoOOOOOooRRoooHHHH in it?

      lula ? easy... OOH OOH globo novo ordorum !!! POOWAAAHHHH uno UNO UNO UNO... that's lula... afaiU

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         4 days ago 

        ridicule exemple...

        let's move the big league

        1st a human mapping model, you can't expect 100%, the famous random, act unknown to the themselves...

        more interesting : quing dynastie? pro "wilson rule over them" ? lol... the tsars ? lol... the ottoman? lol...

        big line... wilson kills them all...

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           4 days ago 

          2 remarks...

          from tea party threat structure : The UNO/OOH the worst of all. the OOH is against the USC and BoR (even if a low iq retard like ritter doesn't understand it)

          1. evident for anyone with more than 1 brain cell like in RT... obfuscation... there are the random event, skewing the theoretical model, and the obfuscation, there intent...

          seems to work well

          historically those the furthest from the "OOH support" (on the axis) got wiped first... (those they could, some harder).

          $0.00
            Reply