You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Well, back to campaigning!
I vote for witnesses based on what they do for the platform
Is this the Twilight Zone? That is why I'm asking you the question. You're currently voting for a witness that spams the Steem blockchain with pictures of dicks and shit.
Sort of how I contacted you to end the flag war and you ignored me, then pretended on chain that it was your idea all along.
You mean the flag war that the guy posting pics of dicks and shit started? And only he was able to stop? I proposed a peace treaty a week prior before you ever got involved. Also, I ignored you because I don't know who the hell you are.
Yes, this is the twilight zone.. as a spammer is asking me why I vote for someone who spams.
As I said, I was questioning why someone would keep their vote on a disabled witness, but you clearly would like to make this personal.
So, I vote for him because I think he has done more for this platform than many others. I vote for him because he curates authors that add value and not just those in his circle jerk. I vote for him because he donates/delegates to many good causes. I vote for him because he runs a reliable witness that doesn’t just stop when it’s not profitable anymore. I vote for him because I think even despite the dick and shit pics that I am not a fan of, he adds value here.
Oh yeah, and he didn’t know who the hell I was either.. but somehow realized I was trying to make something stop for the good of the community.
Maybe his ability to listen to the whole community, not just people who hold a big stake and that he knows personally is another reason I support him.
Maybe it’s because I want to 🤷🏻♀️
But yeah, if his witness was disabled.. I wouldn’t still be voting it.
Feel free to take this personal spat of yours to my blog if you want, as I don’t want to spam up Aggys post anymore.