RE: Social Contracts and Sacred Rituals
Anyone who disagrees with you can have force initiated against them for trying to leave without permission?
Violence isn't an argument. Morality isn't subjective. We've already covered this on other posts.
This is why you shouldn't bother with other people's morality whether they are stoning people in the street, burning women along their husbands (india), drowing young girls (china), executing people (usa), etc etc.
Are you really suggesting that these things are moral from a certain perspective? I wouldn't bother with their "morality" because these things are immoral.
If your way of life is more efficient in liberland then more people will join constituting USA or any other "social contract" nation obsolete.
I'm not sure why I would need to subject myself to the initiation of force in order to not have force initiated against me.
Again, appeal to the cudgel isn't an argument, sophist.
Depends on the principles of morality of that particular country. I don't agree with it but that's just the way it is
You seriously need to open a dictionary. Same applies to your cheerleaders
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morality
: beliefs about what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior
: the degree to which something is right and good : the moral goodness or badness of something
What is good and what is bad is also subjective. Depends on the environment and culture. I can't believe I have to spell these things to you...but i guess if you accept this your entire tinfoil philosophy crumbles.
Whether you like it or not you belong in a society that rules with a democratic rule. One of the rules is the initiation of force as a moral constituent.
Try again. I am explaining basic definitions from the dictionary. You are the sophist since you use the words as you wish.
Truth and morality aren't democratic. Doubling down on your appeal to force doesn't prove your definitions; it just makes you an asshole. Fuck off bro
But they are democratic. I am not making the rules. Nature does. Whatever you considere "moral" is the cumulative will of the people under specific enviromental conditions.
This has been true throughout human history. Also, how the heck you can live with your hypocrytical self when you restrict freedom of speech and then reply on top about voluntaryism?
We obviously have 2 sets of morality and insist that morality of objective. room temperacture I.Q my dear SJW.
(make the gf picture bigger...probably the best thing that happened to you after your long term relationship with your hand in your mom's basement)