You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Adsactly Files 1.2 - Learn ICO with Me
I have zero knowledge or interest in AIOS or its ICO and found about it after @isacoin used @ here tag on steemit.chat.
While usually I find such behavior ( attention seeking ) repulsive, In this case I am thankful for it.
I don't think that at this point the posts regarding AIOS deserve flagging.
Better way of doing things :
The people that had written about the ICO should be given time to edit their posts and at least mention the possibility of AIOS being a scam, on the base that the people doing the ICO are anonymous, use stock photos as their faces, and can not be found on any site with serious identity checking ( like LinkedIn.com ).
Only after that we could start talking about flags for the ones that didn't edit their posts.
You cannot ask someone to change what they post on their personal blog !!! It is their will !!
I am sorry if what I wrote came out like that.
I was not advocating for us to force anyone to edit their posts against their will.
I tried pointing out that on Steem, there are other options than the flag hammer.
The cool part is - you could always update your posts and address any issue that came after you've made them.
And in this case your update can skip the scam part and just point out that, as an example - you like the project, or that you joined not by putting money, but sweat. Or you could add (as many traders do) that your opinion shouldn't be taken as investment advice.
There are a lot of ways to stay positive and conflict free.
Yeah we know what is the cool part and we know how to edit but if someone believes that aios is not scam. so is it right to say you have to remove that post otherwise I will flag you and by the way who are you to point anyone or give time to edit thier post ,its people wil whether they want to remove thier post or not.steemit is decentalised and let it be and don't try to become its centre of attraction or try to handle it .
I think flagging a personal opinion
without at least trying to discuss it,
is not right.
In such cases I prefer 'agreeing to disagree'.