RE: Results from my research about healthy steem community
Hi,
And it also cool to find out that this account @omarscott is just three months old on steemit and wow and she was the one that even graded him 10/10 and gave him his first engagement challenge win 😂.
I didn’t know that give 10/10 to someone that is doing good is a crime
@omarscott was invited by @dexsyluz, that’s correct, she’s running a project called "Connect You" where she introduce new users catching them through platforms like TikTok, so it is the more nearest thing to organic marketing in the platform.
I am a collaborator of this project and I could confirm that @dexsyluz is not related to them in any way more than professional work of guidance.
If it is a crime to support people that is doing good then what is the point of being a curator? I personally have nominated several new authors to weekly tops and I mention that the user is new, and is showing a great talent as blogger.
Another thing. Remember that using emojis and being sarcastic is not a professional behavior, specially if you are trying to create a serious discussion
You are a senior college and I would take advice from by removing my emojis..
No friend 10/10 is not a crime, also grading his post is no crime but skipping others post to do that means favoritism which should no be stopped.
Engagement challenges is not a support program friend it's a game and a challenge. You support by commenting, voting with personal account, voting using booming, steem representative Powers or any other way but no from a contest.
A contest is a game that you must follow rules and fight harder to succeed, it's no given on a as support based or compassion base. The best should win at all time.
This attitude defeats the sole goal of this platform. There are even disadvantages of eating wrongly, so in similar case there are disadvantages in supporting wrongly.