I'm not confused. It seems you are, as all flat earthers must be.
Your confusion seems to be that a logical fallacy of appeal to popularity is any sort of argument against an emergency landing in Alaska from Asia. That 'was' the topic of my post, and you simply posted a bunch of videos about how and why people became flat earthers- which is an appeal to popularity and not a response to the topic, which is what flat earthers always do when one of their claims is rebutted because they can never ever admit that they are wrong even when it's shown conclusively that they are.
So, since you say that I'm confused, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system an argument against an emergency landing in Alaska being perfectly sound on a globe earth?
Or are you just posting off topic articles to promote your content, instead of having an actual discussion... as flat earthers constantly do in order to avoid actual discussion?
In fact, how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system anything but the logical fallacy of an appeal to popularity?
I'm not confused. It seems you are, as all flat earthers must be.
Your confusion seems to be that a logical fallacy of appeal to popularity is any sort of argument against an emergency landing in Alaska from Asia. That 'was' the topic of my post, and you simply posted a bunch of videos about how and why people became flat earthers- which is an appeal to popularity and not a response to the topic, which is what flat earthers always do when one of their claims is rebutted because they can never ever admit that they are wrong even when it's shown conclusively that they are.
So, since you say that I'm confused, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system an argument against an emergency landing in Alaska being perfectly sound on a globe earth?
Or are you just posting off topic articles to promote your content, instead of having an actual discussion... as flat earthers constantly do in order to avoid actual discussion?
In fact, how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system anything but the logical fallacy of an appeal to popularity?