You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: This is How @oracle-d Abuses its Steemit Delegation: Voting 37 Obviously Plagiarized @threespeak Videos by the Same Account in 2 Months + Video Plagiarism Case # 2-37 - Caso de Plagio Videográfico #2-37 @theultimatefood
no excuse for not fighting and finding plagiarism. How many active members does 3Speak have and how many are consistent posters? If it's very few then it would follow the same people are getting votes and at the same time your analysis does bring up some valid points to look into further. Great detective work !
It doesn't matter. Everyone knows there will be fish that falls through the net. The problem comes when they just shrug it off.
The same thing we tell people like @vancouverdining: if we find questionable stuff and you refuse to address it, then you are a piece of shit.
No shrugging. We are putting methods in place to improve this. So far we have used the stake to encourage large you tubers to post to steem. As we are growing, we need to adjust our curation system slightly so that these types of videos do it fall through the net
A central and basic part of onboarding large youtubers to steem is, as you might surmise, verifying that it is actually the youtuber and not a scammer....
Yes correct. How insightful. We have been doing until now manually. The creator in question is one we had not got to yet
The ("creator"!!!!) in question is your number 20th most rewarded user in the last 2 months, if you were just to logically prioritize the verification in the order of reward volumes (as per having a top rewarded user be a scammer is way worse than a marginal user) you would have gotten to it pretty quick. I mean, how much work does it take to verify a user? we do it all the time, it takes less than 15 minutes of work per user, you could have verified your top 20 users by rewards in 5 hours of work. I understand that every part of VP you dont use of that generous delegation is money you lose in curation and in the 10% bene, and that so you have to vote something, and I think that considering the time it would have taken to make these verifications (5 hours max) it becomes very interesting to consider the potential reasons why they were not.
Is it perhaps that it is in your interest not only to vote something and not waste any VP but also give the appearance of voting quality content and that that is why these verification inadvertences happen?
!dramatoken
wow, almost to 1,000. Very good job ! Keep up the hard work to grow and keep quality content!!
Out of the 998, this is the Top 20th "author" most rewarded by ThreeSpeak
in the last 31 days, so while you might not have time to check the 998, you certainly have time to check the top 20 and especially a user from whom you vote almost every single post....