You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SC-S29|Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 2: The Sound Map
Thank you for your participation in Geo-Quest Mystery – Week 2: The Sound Map. Here is an evaluation of the post by @ripon0630, following the official Week 2 rubric for Geo-Quest Mystery.
Evaluation Summary
| Criteria | Score | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. SteemAtlas Pin & Sound Description | 1.80 / 2.0 | The SteemAtlas pin is clearly included with coordinates and a specific named location (Bhatiary–Hathazari Link Road, BMA, Chittagong). The post explains the place well (mountains, lake, restricted access hours, light traffic) and provides a clear sound context (quiet nature, birds, leaves, occasional vehicles). To reach full points, add one concise “listener anchor” line: where to stand for the clearest sound layers (near trees vs open road edge) and what the first dominant sound is within 5 seconds. |
| 2. Creativity of Mission & Hidden Sound Challenge | 0.70 / 2.0 | The location choice is excellent for a Sound Map (rare quiet road, birds, breeze, lake). However, the Hidden Sound Challenge is missing in the required format: there are no three hidden sound clues for readers to guess. Instead, the post describes sounds directly. For higher points, add 3 subtle clue lines (metaphors) hinting at three distinct sounds (e.g., wings, leaves, distant engine) and ask others to identify them. |
| 3. Speem.watch Proof Video (20–60 seconds, focus on sound) | 1.70 / 2.5 | A proof video (IPFS) is provided, and the text shows correct intent (focus on birds, then vehicles passing). Comments indicate mixed accessibility: one user reports the video file was damaged/unloadable, while others say they listened and enjoyed it. Because the proof is not consistently accessible, the score is reduced. To improve: re-upload or ensure a stable Speem.watch/IPFS link, keep 10–15 seconds standing still, and avoid any export glitches that corrupt playback. |
| 4. Storytelling Quality | 2.20 / 2.5 | Strong descriptive storytelling with a clear sense of place and calm atmosphere, plus practical realism (road restrictions, low settlement, safety awareness). To reach full points, include a more explicit one-minute listening segment: loudest sound, smallest sound, repeating rhythm, and one surprising sound. |
| 5. Engagement (Listening / Guessing others) | 0.50 / 1.0 | Engagement is present in replies on the post, but there is no clear evidence in the excerpt that the author commented on at least two other entries and guessed their sounds. Partial credit is given for interaction and responsiveness. Full points require active guessing on other participants’ posts. |
Final Score: 6.90 / 10
Remarks:
This is a high-quality location choice with strong SteemAtlas documentation and an appealing natural sound theme. The main scoring limits are: (1) the missing three-sounds hidden challenge, (2) the proof video accessibility (some viewers unable to load), and (3) engagement beyond the author’s own comment section. Fixing the video reliability and adding a proper hidden-sound puzzle would quickly push this entry into the 8+ range.
— Geo-Quest Mystery Jury
OK, dear. Thank you for the review.