RE: Suggestions For Selection of Curators
Many, many thanks to dear @dove11 Uncle. I completely agree with you. However, there are a few things that might include some personal advice or some questioning. The opinions you have expressed on all the matters to improve this platform and keep its authenticity impartial are very acceptable.
We are included under a set of rules. We work and carry out responsibilities based on the rules given to us by this platform. However, many people often act unnoticed outside some of these rules. We all should be responsible for that. Trying to apply every single step may be a bit rushed. But we can start with a little. This way, we can gradually understand whether the platform is improving or not.
The three sections you've divided for the curator. It's a good initiative. But I feel that it might be a bit too much for the moment. However, it can be started in some parts.
Just keep in mind, what I’ve noticed over the past two to three years is that many users whose IDs were completely pure and accurate, the new users coming in now, no one worries much about their verification. I feel this is very important. It's necessary for everyone and the platform to take responsibility in this matter.
Another thing I liked is that new users should start voting with a lower percentage. Like you mentioned, 10%. That can be done. Because there is importance to deputation. Everyone works hard but doesn’t get reputation easily. So reputation matters. The voting percentage can be adjusted based on reputation and the quality of the post, which is something I’ve done.
Personally, I want the proposal you gave to definitely help us improve at least a little, even though you can never reach the top of a tree in one step; we should move forward little by little. That way we can understand how much our progress is happening and how much is happening on the other side of the platform. I am praying and wishing for everyone, and I wish for success.
Thank you my dear @memamun for all your effort in coming up with your input on this complicated topic. it's not easy to write such in depth view unless you spent a lot of your time even if you're so busy with your religious teaching and curation job.
I know what you mean when you say to stay impartial is not easy or mistakes are bound to happen but then money is something which is mother of all evil and hard to resist that sure comes into the way.
You said
maybe it sounds too much so that's my suggestion and I know Steemt Team has no obligation to accept my suggestion or they can increase/reduce it as they wish but I see it one of the methods to improve the things at this point in time.
A couple of points you mentioned confused me like
I fail to understand if a person is putting his best foot forward why will they not achieve reputation? You and me joined this site at almost the same time and you're doing better than me, ain't you? I appreciate your effort in making the reputation better by giving higher votes who deserve them, keep it up.
My suggestion to you is to look for posts in your own language to encourage who are struggling in other languages and also write posts in your own language which will help you express yourself better.
I hope you know what I mean! Thank you once again for your precious views on my humble effort.
0.00 SBD,
3.97 STEEM,
3.97 SP