[Steem Seven website update] Improving the Booming selector tool: The vote list, perfomance & graphic improvements
https://steemseven.com website update announcement!
NOTE: It may be necessary to clear your browser cache to see the latest version of the site.
We are pleased to announce that our website has been updated with new features and improvements to provide an even better user experience. We have worked hard to ensure that our website is faster, more reliable and easier to use.
Among the improvements we've implemented are the inclusion of loading icons so users can clearly see when information is loading in the Booming selection tool, which significantly improves the browsing experience. In addition, we have improved the speed of the site so that users can access our content more quickly and efficiently.
We have also optimized our private APIs to better segment information and allow Booming's selection tool to display data progressively.
Apart from that, now you can see the list of booming votes received and the exact time the vote was received by the author by tapping on the vote number box.
We are committed to providing an exceptional user experience and hope that these improvements to our website will enhance your experience when interacting with us. Thank you for visiting us and we hope you enjoy our updated website!
Support us as witness
Support partner witnesses
Delegate
| 100SP | 500SP | 1000SP | 2000SP | 5000SP |
You will receive a x15 voting value!
¡Estupendo!
¿Quizás puedas programar algo así para sc-Votes también?
Desgraciadamente, observo cada vez más a menudo que "el pequeño sc" vota, aunque otro equipo o booming ya hayan votado. Algunos "pequeños sc" incluso votan cuando sc01 ya ha estado allí... :-(
Tal vez podríamos brindar la posibilidad de escoger las cuentas curadoras que se desean checar, así ampliaría las posibilidades y serviría para cualquier proyecto!
That would be a good option.
However, I personally do not want to name specific accounts, it gives me such a feeling of "denouncing". I think the curators of the "small sc" see very well that there are already higher votes on the items they choose. Either, they make it easy for themselves or engage in nepotism - both not okay on posts of trust.
But if there were a tool, with the "official" request to use this, the respective conscience would have to take one more hurdle.
I have no idea about development. But would it be possible to query steemcurator01-09 in summary?
If you can imagine it, you can program it!
:0
You might, I can't...
Thank you, friend!
I'm @steem.history, who is steem witness.
Thank you for witnessvoting for me.
please click it!
(Go to https://steemit.com/~witnesses and type fbslo at the bottom of the page)
The weight is reduced because of the lack of Voting Power. If you vote for me as a witness, you can get my little vote.
Excelente herramienta que brindará información de gran importancia para los responsables de administrar las comunidades y las cuentas curadoras.
Gracias por el aporte. .
Your post is manually rewarded by the
World of Xpilar Community Curation Trail
STEEM AUTO OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY XPILAR TEAM
https://steemit.com/~witnesses vote xpilar.witness
Thank you for this tool!
I had a little issue (in the booming selector tool): If I enter the user name with one or more upper case letter, the script freezes. May be you should change the input value to lower case letters at first.
After many recharges finally managed to figure out how to check Booming Support's weekly report. Thanks for presenting it here nicely.
This post has been featured in the latest edition of Steem News...
If you would like to support Steem News please consider voting for @pennsif.witness