Routing Layer Attacks and Their Effect on the Blockchain Network

Source

INTRODUCTION:

Here are some of the more volatile and damaging attacks on the integrity of any blockchain system but are rarely mentioned and understood. They are not attacks directed against the consensus mechanism or the smart contracts but rather the communication pathways between different nodes within the blockchain. Such attacks can paralyze network connections, sabotage the propagation of transactions, or cut off certain nodes from the network, which threatens the distributed nature of the blockchain.

As it is in most blockchain systems, nodes within a blockchain system tend to communicate over the internet. This communication layer, which is referred to as the ‘routing layer’, occupies a center stage in departmental digitization. They involve the prevention, interruption, or information alteration among exchanges of information between nodes leading to reasons such as transaction slowness or network forks which are likewise common crises. These attacks are effective because they focus on the lower level of internet infrastructure instead of the higher layer of the blockchain protocol.

Depending on the context, such attacks on the blockchain network by way of routing layer can produce different results from minimal changes in transacting validation to severe cases like double spending or splits of networks. All these risks and the existing threats should be taken into account and appropriate and timely actions must be taken in order to ensure to preserve the integrity and functionality of the blockchain network.

NETWORK PARTITIONING

Routing layer attacks cause significant disruption to the availability and use of the given network structure. Cutting off internal communication leads to a situation where a subsection of blockchain nodes is cut off from the other nodes in the network. The cut-off nodes remain active and produce their own blockchain, resulting in a limited split in multi-chain framework. After the split has resolved, merging the split chains will often lead to problems.

Partitioning of networks leads to an increased exposure to double spending attacks in that some of the cut off nodes could for instance accept conflicted transactions with the rest of the network. In addition, it might work against the speed of transaction completion, as the cut-off nodes have no means to receive or relay new transactions and transaction blocks. Such critical matters can later dampen the confidence and efficiency that people have over the blockchain technology.

In order for the blockchain network to reduce the effect of the partitioned network, proper peer to peer communication across the networks is required. Such design will allow them to be able to recover from such adverse effects as routing attack that may lead to de-synchronization of a node from the network.

ECLIPSE ATTACKS

Besides the above, layer routing attacks also give room for eclipse attacks to be performed. In an eclipse attack, a malicious person uses connections of target nodes to isolate the given node or set of nodes from the rest of the network. Once cut off, the attacker is free to tell the isolated nodes whatever false information they want, such as fake transaction data or fake blocks to control them.

Source

Attacks of this type are especially pernicious in blockchains operating on the principles of proof-of-stake or proof-of-work, where reaching a consensus requires timely and orderly dissemination of valid transactions and blocks. When nodes are isolated, they may validate and endorse faulty transactions without knowing their malicious content or be left in a consensus lag, thus endangering the network.

Eclipse attacks can be defended against by employing a mechanism whereby the programmers of the blockchain ensure that the peer selection strategies are varied. Nodes must be motivated to multiply and randomly connect with their peers, hence there can never be one dominator of all their communication links.

DELAYED TRANSACTION PROPAGATION:

Attacks on the routing layer can also result in delayed transaction propagation such that it takes a longer time than expected for a transaction to reach all nodes in the network, this is referred to as delayed transaction propagation. This delay can, however, reduce the overall throughput of the blockchain and therefore affected are real-time transaction execution. In scenarios where the transaction should be final, for example in financial applications, delayed propagation can create challenges.

The lack of prompt transaction propagation makes it difficult for the consensus to be reached within the network. This makes the system at risk of numerous attacks including double spending where an individual maliciously attempts to use the same cryptocurrency more than once before the system has confirmed the transaction. In addition, delays have a tendency to diminish user satisfaction as members of the network will endure longer periods waiting for their transaction claims to be confirmed.

Blockchain networks can also employ fast propagation method and enhance the routing paths of the transactions in order to avoid racing where there is delayed transaction propagation. In addition, there could be a preference of critical information for the transactions over the reasonable traffic on the network in order to quicken the time for validation of the transaction.

INCREASED VULNERABILITY TO OTHER ATTACKS:

Routing layer attacks usually pave ways for a more dangerous onslaught to be launched against the blockchain systems. For instance, by conducting node isolation or node tardiness, an advantage is gained whereby the yan attack or the sybil farming attack can be executed as many identities are used so that the network is flooded with fake users. Attackers can also carry out selfish mining attacks using which they can route the network or operate it in such a manner that their attackers withhold blocks for some time in order to enhance their efficiency in the subsequent block mining process.

Heightened chances of these sorts of attacks, in turn, make the entire security of the wide area network associated with the blockchain become more cryptographically advanced. It puts participants in danger of double-spending, invalid block dissemination, lack of consensus and other forms of risks. They possibly lead to financial and trust issues in the blockchain system and should be mitigated out wise.

Additional secure operational approaches for the blockchain networks will be more effective only if there are different operational vulnerabilities to routing layer attacks and those additional risks. This entails such actions as getting rid of reasons for nodes not to make their contribution in order to protect the systems community or developing better communication systems improving traffic management within the network or better assisting the detection of attacks by synergetic nodes and reducing their effect.

Source

CONCLUSION

Routing layer assaults attacks have a high risk against the performance and security of blockchain networks. By interrupting the communication links between nodes, they can result in the partitioning of the network, eclipse attacks, delay in the collapse of the transaction network, and other efficient network attacks.

There is a need to focus more on better protocols for communication between peers, on quicker mechanisms for pushing transactions across the blockchain networks so as to preserve their decentralized nature and functionality stance.