What Sam Harris Gets Wrong About Meditation, Or, How to Meditate Without Getting Weird

Meditation is an important part of my life. Doing 10 minutes of it each morning keeps me stable and relaxed, trending towards calmness rather than revving up towads insanity.
It makes sense. In this loud era, meditation is a counterbalance to the chaos.
But the older I get, the more frusterated I feel about the culture surrounding mindfulness and meditation. It seems that otherwise rational humans get weird when they think about meditating. They defer their own common sense to gurus and experts.
They say, “I don’t buy into this mystical stuff… but just let the guru do their thing.”
They talk about the illusion of the self and of transcendent, life-altering states. Even the most rational of the spirutal leaders, Sam Harris, compares deep meditative states with religious experiences.
For the record I love Sam Harris and am only picking on him to get pageviews. For the rest of this article I won’t attack him at all.

Sam Harris: Philosopher, Podcaster, and Neuroscientist
A Rational View of Meditation
Then there’s my view of mindfulness…
I started meditating in my apartment during my college years, learning from a massive 700 page eBook that I only read a few chapters of.
Amongst the ramblings, there was a simple instruction: Sit, pay attention to the breath right where the air hits the tip of your nose, and try not to get caught up in your thoughts. The book recommended 10 minutes per session as a starting point, so that’s what I did.
After a few weeks of 10 minute meditation sessions, I was amazed at how strong my focus became. I could feel my mind shift towards calmness a little faster with each 10 minute session.
Now 7 years later my practice is not much different. There have been ups and downs - periods of relatively intense practice, 20 minutes twice per day, and months of no activity at all. On average, I do 10 to 20 minutes per day in the morning.
And to this day: I see nothing mystical in it.
I see no signs of supernatural phenomenon: There’s no whiff of a “deeper realm,” no new kind of “energy” to feel, no echoes of spirits in the internal fog.
There’s just me. My mind. The deeper I go, the more my view of myself progresses. That includes an evolution of my “illusion of the self” experience, perhaps the most hyped up element of mindfulness.
The Mythos of the Illusion of the Self
The “illusion of the self,” as I see it, is real… but it is less mystical than advertised.
During my more intense meditative journeys, I have experienced strong feelings of “selflessness.”

The feeling was of me NOT being the voice in my head.
You know, the voice where you think to yourself - “I am hungry, am I late for work, should I watch TV or go to bed, me me me…” — that voice is sometimes thought of as the center of “the self”, that stream of thoughts basically BEING you or coming straight from the central “you” thing in the brain.
But instead of seeing the “me” voice as me, I started to see the words in my brain as an extra part of me — an external part, something that could be removed without eliminating the ME from the equation. Like an arm or a leg, a PART of me, but not ME.
Now I was “the watcher,” perceiving my mental “me” voice as well as my emotions and physical sensations.
Another 2-3 years passed by. I began to interrogate “the watcher” itself, the “me” inside my mind that watched all of the other parts including the “me” voice.
And sure enough it changed agian. The watching “me” in my mind itself turned into just another part of me, external, possibly removable without losing the ME from the equation. Another limb. But this time, there was nothing else to shift the “me” to.
When the watching “me” stopped feeling like “me”, there was nothing left. I could see all of the old “me” parts - the voice, the watcher, the emotions, the physical sensations, the memories of the past, the expectations and ideas of the future, and more sensations beyond it all. Each was a part of me, but none was me itself.
The result was a decentralized self: many parts adding up to the emergent property of me, which did not feel centrally localized anywhere.
The “decentralized self” mental model is something I want to develop more. I only briefly tap into this feeling on rare occasion, and it is not an experience I can readily force to happen. Yet, it becomes more natural and more of my “normal way” as I practice it.
It’s not mystical. The self may be an “illusion,” but that doesn’t mean it is complete fantasy. Perhaps the self does exist but it exists in a different form than we are familiar with.
If a car hits you - you feel it, not me! So there’s a separation there. It’s important to factor that common sense fact into any model of the self or of selflessness.
The Self is an Illusion - But Not a Conspiracy
We are sold the idea of the self as a conspiracy.
The guru says: “You’ve been told your whole life that you are somebody, but it is not true. There is no “there” there! You are not a self, you are actually one limitless pulsing of energy and light through the universe…”
In other words, the whole thing is a setup! And how convenient is it that our “self” is designed to play along with society’s norms? This is the conspiracy mindset of selflessness.
The conspiracy model plays to our human instincts. We want to be part of a tribe, and we sometimes feel like the world is out to get us. When we learn that there is an “illusion of the self,” and when we decide that our society is perpetuating this illusion, we can end up becoming very conspiratorial and develop an “us vs. them” picture of the situation.
I encourage you to resist the conspiracy model of the self.
In my experience, the self is an illusion. It is not all that it appears to be. That’s the central truth that most meditators agree on. But it’s not an intentional conspiracy, certainly not a thing that the “powers that be” are forcing us to feel.
And you don’t need a new religion or new philosophy to begin to see the self as an illusion.
The most important fact is that doing meditation for 20 minutes per day, maybe a bit more, has tremendous benefits.
I encourage you to approach meditation rationally. Furthermore, accept that we live in an era where consciousness and the mind are NOT understood.
The way we view consciousness now is likely to be completely wrong, totally archaic compared to the model humanity will figure out in the coming centuries. It’s best IMO to accept this and live with it, rather than to rage against it.
Meditate.
Above all else, sit down and focus on your breathing, on the sensation right where the air meets the tip of your noise, with no music or TV playing in the background.
Do this 10 minutes a day, perhaps after breakfast. It feels wonderful.
How is your meditation practice going lately? What new lessons have you learned? I’d love to hear your stories in the comments.

Sounds like somebody needs to try a meditation retreat. Though we've obviously allready talked all about this. My meditation practice never felt really "mystical" or even vaguely psychedelic until about halfway through a retreat. Even then "mystical" is a bit of a misnomer because a really important part of that experience was realizing that everyday life is "mystical" and ordinary sensations can be the portal to things that are totally extraordinary. My day to day practice rarely has a "mystical" quality, but trying a meditation retreat would very certainly give you some perspective on what "mystical" means.
Why is "mystical" a good sensation to chase tho? My hypothesis is that "mystical" feelings are perhaps a TRAP rather than useful, relevant sensations.
It relates to another topic maybe: The distinctions between meaningless but pleasant "bliss" states vs. useful but often terrifying "introspection" states... I've experienced both of these (as far as I understand it) -- but does one need to meditate for 10 days straight to dip into these experiences?
well I wouldn't say that mystical is a good sensation if you are chasing it, and it is certainly not the goal of a meditation practice, but if feeling it helps you deepen your understanding of what people mean when they say "mystical" then it's certainly useful. Moar understanding = moar good. That being said, chasing it will get you nowhere in the long run, just as chasing it before you've experienced it will make it harder to get there through meditation. To the next point, I wouldn't say that bliss states are any more or less "meaningless" than introspection states, meaning is derived super subjectively obviously, and if the "meaning" you derive is that any given moment can contain bliss that is accessible by concentration, that is certainly not a "meaningless" observation, especially if your bliss extends to the world around you.
One does not need to meditate for 10 days straight to dip into these experiences, but it certainly helps if you want todive into them. Quantity has a quality all of its own, and I don't think I'm alone in saying that the meditation you do on retreat has a certain deeper quality to it at many times. Of course there are no hard and fast rules, but I'd be surprised if you didn't feel something similiar after a retreat. In short, don't knock it till ya try it.
Truly meditation is an important part of one's life. I remember when I still battles with my thoughts that it kften very difficult for a five minutes meditation without being drawn in one's thought, however slow, steady or rather consistency made me better at it that sooner, I began to see its fruits
it is funny to look back at those early sessions, like your five minutes, lol. Back then any kind of sitting still seemed difficult.
Even these days, I will occasionally struggle with a 10 minute meditation. The mind does not want to calm down, or the body is so restless!!! So it goes
I've just walked in from my Pilates class and sat down with a cup of tea and yours, fortuitously, is the first post in my feed today. It was my first class with this teacher and after a long time. My previous teacher was very meditational, about stilling the external and internal noise and tuning into yourself and feeling what was happening inside you. Today, I battled with my internal voice, which was quite grumpy and put out and threatening to go home, and it took nearly the whole class to calm myself down and get into the now.
This tutor has more of a personal trainer approach, it's more about exercise and physical activity and fitness than it is about being in tune and aligned with yourself. I have a 1:1 with the same tutor on Thursday and your post has really helped me start thinking about the conversation I want to have with her.
Moving on from that, your post resonates with lots of different philosophical ideas (in which I'm an expert in none), so where you are talking about the separation of you and me, I was reminded of Cartesian ideas, which I think has been quite a damaging set of ideas, leading us to think about our bodies as separate from ourselves. It's also been quite damaging for women, allowing for the idea of "the other", so not the same as me, and therefore perfectly okay to treat as less than me (that applies to a wide range of people who've been colonised as well, I'm just thinking about women at the moment).
You also talk about taking a rational approach to meditation and I'm reminded of the Enlightment philosophers and their empirical approach to science and understanding the world and, actually, some of those ideas are changing a little now - much as you are talking about how our understanding in the future might be quite different.
And the third set of ideas that come into my head are about what you are saying about conspiracy ideas which reminded me of another post Sunday thoughts in the Quiet City by @phoenixwren which talks about the Puritanical work obsession (and I'm paraphrasing wildly) and Max Weber's ideas about capitalism and how society is ordered.
I was struck by how many very different ideas were encompassed in your post and how all of these, pretty much all of them centuries old, are resonating with all of us today.
The two big things I am attending to at the moment are running and knitting and, with both of them, what I'm interested in, the draw if you like, is the opportunity for meditation, or possibly, flow. Are they the same thing or different? I don't know, but it is about being in the now, and being. That's my story for today.
Aye! That is a lot to chew on. I'm glad the post stimulated your brain, it's good to think about and challenge these ideas. I think the relation between the body and the mind, as well as the "Watching Mind" versus the "passive mind," is one of the best areas for meditative inquiry. There is so much to learn just by watching our own minds and feeling our mental and physical patterns.