You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What will the world look like without rich people?
Who do you think coined the term?
The same people that coined libertarian until it became a crime to be one in france.
They began to use anarchist after that.
Marx bastardized the term.
You would know that, but,....#fakeducation
The people whom call themselves libertarians and the people whom call themselves anarchists oppose communism and applaud capitalism.
The terms have opposed meanings.
You got a 22.22% upvote from @proffit courtesy of @stimialiti!
Send at least 0.01 SBD/STEEM to get upvote , Send 1 SBD/STEEM to get upvote + resteem
Not originally they didnt.
You are using coopted definitions.
Anarchists pioneered both terms.
The definitions were hijacked to poison the terms.
If you control the definitions of words you control those that use them.
Are communism, socialism and collectivism the same thing, or will you draw the differences?
In Anarchy there is supposedly no government, until some form of tyranny arises out of it.
In communism there is a higher authority.
Regardless of whose terminology I use, what do you mean by communism?
Anything that requires rule by force is off the list.
If you read the histories with that in mind you will notice that rule by force was only off the peoples' tables, never their ruler's.
This contradicts the original premise of the terms, and this fact is convienently lost in the books written by those that took power by force, and control subject matter in the skools.
Rule by force is the disease, who and how are symptoms.
You will notice who is boss as an option, but not having a boss is never on any ballots.
You quite ignored my questions.
You replied but did not answer.
Anarchy is not a stable state and leads to worse tyrannies than the ones which it supposed to replace.
In anarchy there is no higher force to oppose rule by force, and this allows the rise of more primitive forms of rule by force.
There can only be rule by force.
You have to choose a devil.
Harsh but true.
Ask yourself, did your utopia ever exist?
Then give me an example, or explain why it never happened, or existed, but only shortly.
I know why it is unsustainable, and I already posted you a video which answers this, if I remember correctly.
You got upvoted from @adriatik bot! Thank you to you for using our service. We really hope this will hope to promote your quality content!
You got a 17.68% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!
False, this is a lie perpetuated by those that rule by force.
Anarchy is the mother of order.
This is why we circle the (A).
False, every adult, and child, knowingly rejects rule by force as a means of obtaining one's goals.
Those that try to rule by force are put down.
An attack on one is an attack on all.
More #fakeducation by those that control your sources of information.
I can link you to books from more than 100 years ago that lay this out quite clearly, but you would have to read them.
Again, that is false.
It is a lie perpetuated by those that benefit under rule by force.
Not many people benefit from wars, most just want to raise their children in peace, but those that profit from war wont let them.
They fill their heads with lies generationally because it keeps them in power.
You are a victim of that, as are we all.
Because the crapitalusts bomb them back into submission.
https://listverse.com/2016/06/29/10-instances-of-anarchist-societies-that-actually-worked/
No, you are brainwashed by Russian destabilization propaganda disguised as anarchism.
A hostile state welcomes anarchy as long as it is turned against its enemy.
None of the examples you provided lasted, because they were overcame by rule by force governments.
Anarchy could never last anywhere for long, ever.
I already encouraged you to try to learn what a stable state is.
In this combination of words, state does not refer to a political structure, but is a synonym of the word condition.
A local energetic minimum is called a stable state, if I remember correctly.
Any divergence from it will either revert back to it, or to another stable state.
This is a fine example of how basic mathematics and physics help in comprehension of situations that may seem to be outside of the strict realm of natural sciences.
You got a 10.00% upvote from @ubot courtesy of @stimialiti! Send 0.05 Steem or SBD to @ubot for an upvote with link of post in memo.
Every post gets Resteemed (follow us to get your post more exposure)!
98% of earnings paid daily to delegators! Go to www.ubot.ws for details.
Hmm, most of the authors are russians.
Nah, Proudhon was french, and he started the ball rolling.
Sounds reasonable.
It will have to be capable of fighting off the bullies that would take over.
What is more stable than cooperation of the whole?
It certainly isnt crapitalism's dod eat dog, nor rule by force's wars.
You got a 45.60% upvote from @proffit courtesy of @stimialiti!
Send at least 0.01 SBD/STEEM to get upvote , Send 1 SBD/STEEM to get upvote + resteem
This comment has received a 13.39 % upvote from @steemdiffuser thanks to: @stimialiti.
Bids above 0.1 SBD may get additional upvotes from our trail members.
Get Upvotes, Join Our Trail, or Delegate Some SP