RE: Steemit: A Mind in Whirlwind
Ich mag weder wie der steemcurator hier auftritt noch mag ich sein Vote !
es sei den das Vote ist angepasst mit einem persönlichen Kommentar .
Ich halte den SC01-02 für einen Arroganten Account der gerne hätte das so viele wie möglich nach seiner Pfeife tanzen, ich habe von Anfang an
(nach dem ersten Vote vom SC01 oder 02)
im zu verstehen gegeben das er gerne mit seinem Vote an meinem Account vorbei tanzen kann und dabei fühle ich mich sehr gut, believe me .
Das ich ab und zu ein Vote von einem seiner Kurator bekomme ist OK wenn es angepasst ist „ohne“ Standard Kommentar , ansonsten werde ich sehr unangenehm , ein paar wenige SC Kuratoren haben das verstanden .
Der STEEMCURATOR ist für mich ein rotes Tuch 🟥
Du hast hier viele anerkennende Kommentare bekommen dass ist der eigentliche WERT, nicht das Vote !
VgA🎅
Thank you for your feedback; I truly respect your opinion. However, as I’ve mentioned before in one of my responses, I don’t believe in labeling anything as purely good or evil.
The team likely considered a model or strategy to keep the platform functional and the blogging space active. Perhaps others have proposed alternatives that were ultimately deemed impractical. I don’t have a concrete solution myself regarding this matter. As we often claim that Steemit is a hobby (a hobby that you can wish to adopt as per your convenience) and can never replace a job, there must still be a way to keep the platform running and humming. How exactly? That’s another question entirely.
The initiatives taken by the team are bound to have flaws, just like any model in the world. My observations—and perhaps suggestions—are made within these confines.
That said, I don’t deny the existence of biases, favoritism, and differences—not only where the team is involved but also among some regular bloggers. Unfortunately, there are those who continuously abuse their privileges when given a larger stake, and that’s something we cannot overlook.
I’ve also touched on many other topics in my post, sharing my observations. For instance, the criteria for defining a “good” post is worth discussing. If only certain types of posts are consistently supported and, by virtue of trending, become the standard for quality, then creativity is bound to suffer—and, frankly, I already see it happening.
0.00 SBD,
0.26 STEEM,
0.26 SP