Steemit: A Mind in Whirlwind

On average, Steemit takes up about two to three hours of my day—sometimes more. Should I say take up? Shouldn’t it be fun? So, what do you call an activity that occupies your time but that you intentionally choose to invest in! Anyways, writing a post is just the start; engaging with other Steemians, reading comments, and supporting others is equally important. And then there’s the part where I try to stay updated: keeping track of what’s happening on the chain, understanding dev posts, and exploring what’s new.

I know I’m not the only one. Many Steemians are just as committed—dedicating their time, creativity, and energy here.

So where am I going with this?

Is Steemit Easy Money? Not Quite.

Is it a futile hobby?????

I don't know, let's think about it together...

This is something that needs to be understood by everyone.

Yes, Steemit can be seen as a hobby—one that’s far better than scrolling aimlessly through Instagram, Facebook, YouTube or similar platforms. It’s creative, it’s informative, and it connects you with people worldwide.

But here’s where it gets tricky: it has started to feel unfair. Why? Because, of course, the monetary factor is involved. Deny it or admit it—it’s there, and it’s the fuel that motivates most writers, certainly developers, investors, witnesses... everyone in the ecosystem.

I’ve observed that most of the posts receiving support tend to come from challenges, followed by the 'usual writers'—those who consistently appear in the spotlight. This is an observation I’ve made over the course of more than a year.

Now, I don’t want to discredit anyone. Let’s admit it: the usuals do write more than others. They are consistent.

But the question is:

Is their content always of quality?

Is it always interesting, informative, and worth the support?

When a platform thrives on creativity and community, shouldn’t the support be more balanced and reflective of the diverse talent here?
I believe these are questions worth asking. But to whom ?

I can give examples where some good authors have lost interest in blogging altogether. As o1eh pointed out, and I quote:

"Yes, I have noticed that some of the good bloggers have become inactive. But I'm still not sure if it's a natural process, if it's due to the lack of SBD, or if they're just disappointed with the platform 😕."

So yes, there can be multiple factors for this. Some may naturally move on, others may be discouraged by rewards, but I still believe one of the biggest factors is the "unfairness" that comes with the distribution of votes, duties, and—dare I say—even a slight favouritism.

But then you might ask, who is favored?

There is no question of favoritism.

This is a decentralized platform. Why are you saying such things?

Okay, I agree...

But do I fully?

So I keep wondering: When a platform (should) thrive/s on creativity and community, shouldn’t the support be more balanced and reflective of the diverse talent here?

Steemit is a rewarding space, but rewards alone shouldn’t define it. It’s the effort, the voice, and the connections that should hold value.

Talking of connections, hihi, my mind is racing at 400 miles per hour—patience, patience… everything will be shared, just need to gather my thoughts. Dheeraj kro Maan. (Take it easy, mind, take it easy). 😅

One question at a time:

Steemit and the Question of "Favoured" Topics

When it comes to choosing blogging topics, I believe in one simple rule: write with purpose. Whether it’s an emotional reflection, a fun experience, or something deeply informative, every post starts with why—why this topic, why now, and who it is for?

But here's where things get interesting—especially on Steemit.

Why are only certain types of blogs consistently favored?

Have you noticed that the spotlight often shines on posts packed with statistics, challenges, or a million pictures? Don’t get me wrong—there’s value in detailed, data-heavy blogs. But where does that leave the lighter, more engaging, or creative forms of content?

Why is "light/interesting" blogging not promoted most of the time?

Not every post needs to be a deep dive into analytics or a picture-filled travelogue. (Although I am a big fan of travelogues - but you ain't travelling al the time). Sometimes, a simple story, a relatable thought, or an engaging reflection can resonate more with readers. Light, creative content often invites more discussions and connections—something that should be valued on a community-based platform like Steemit.

This brings me to another question:

What is the actual criteria for choosing the “Post of the Week”?

Does it always have to be lengthy? Must it tick the boxes of stats, multiple sections, and endless images? If so, we might be unintentionally discouraging writers who bring a unique, yet simpler voice to the platform.

Steemit thrives on diversity. The creativity here is unmatched, but it risks being stifled if the definition of a "good post" is too narrow. Quality comes in many forms—whether it’s an elaborate analysis, an emotional microstory, or a lighthearted blog that makes readers smile.

Shouldn’t we celebrate all of these equally?

Let’s broaden the scope. Let’s value variety. And most importantly, let’s ask: are we missing out on hidden gems because we’re too focused on certain type of “good post”?

I want to say much more, but in doing so, I might upset people—some may think I’m pointing fingers at them, others may assume it’s a case of “grapes are sour” because I’m not among the favorites. But let me say this:

It doesn’t matter how seldom one posts—if they are bringing quality to the platform, then that should be what truly counts. Quality, creativity, and effort should always hold more weight than quantity or consistency alone.

I’d love to hear your thoughts. Is this something you’ve noticed too?