RE: We Need Your Help to Protect Steem

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: We Need Your Help to Protect Steem

future.witness (70)in #steem • 6 years ago

"it's an attempt to demonstrate/educate how the original 22.2 softfork should have been announced, before anyone adopted the code".

I guess you are right on this ;)

"So what? Mad at them for abandoning Steem? Mad at them for being involved in Hive? "

But not on this. Nobody here care about Hive nor about people abandoning Steem, since they already had a wrong mind, better they leave and do what they want as they want. We even wish them good luck :)

6 years ago in #steem by future.witness (70)

$0.00

Sort:

Trending

[-]

crimsonclad (66) 6 years ago

Nobody here care about Hive nor about people abandoning Steem, since they already had a wrong mind, better they leave and do what they want as they want. We even wish them good luck :)

You ⬆️, and them ⬇️.

Moreover, different members from the forked Blockchain are still actively spamming and milking the Steem ecosystem. Hostile actions, such as downvoting, against Steem users with different opinions were taken by the the forked Blockchain.

As for now, there is no clear declaration from the leadership or accounts of the forked Blockchain that it is not the goal to harm the Steem Blockchain and community. The hostile attacks may never stop.

Sounds like you're not sure what your code does, and that someone here is lying about intent. It also sounds like you don't actually like any of the things the blockchain you are charged with securing and upholding does. The ability to earn (milk) is countered by the ability to downvote. The concern that people you don't like are able to earn and that you aren't simply able to downvote them generally tells me that you have no clue how your chain works, and that you'd likely be better served by coming up with a team of core code developers to simply change then entire reward system rather than go back on every word you've said in the brief time you've existed by trying to tag individual accounts ineffectually.

$0.04

5 votes

[-]

cadawg (68) 6 years ago

Run backup servers you cheap fucks

$0.02

2 votes

[-]

inertia (73) 6 years ago (edited)

I guess you are right on this ;)

Unfortunately, you did not read the entire sentence. It failed to rise above and demonstrate the proper deploy process because we are already seeing witnesses signal 0.22.888 without code being published. So sad.

But not on this.

So are we playing 20 questions? This is stupid.

$0.00

2 votes

[-]

svemirac (71) 6 years ago

So what's up with freezing funts then?

$0.00

[-]

don-t (72) 6 years ago (edited)

it´s as silly as the HIVE-troups do with SUN´s stake before and with the people who had an other opinion like they had.
It´s that simple, so don´t understand why anybody here is ringing the bell now, HIVE-GUYS have had done this first and might have known what this will bring up !

$0.00

2 votes

[-]

jacobtothe (70) 6 years ago

You're trying to compare two completely different courses of action. Such deliberate conflation and equivocation signal either laziness or malice on your part.

$0.00

4 votes

[-]

xxxxxxxxxx (57) 6 years ago