Whoever wrote this has no idea what they're talking about. Or it's parody. Or it's an attempt to demonstrate/educate how the original 22.2 softfork should have been announced, before anyone adopted the code, even though it has a 12 hour time limit and ... no code. Not sure.

It is impossible to be responsive to the 12-hour demand because there are problems like this:

• Accounts that ran the version 0.23 during the Hardfork on Steem and were still in the Top 20 rank, shortly before the Hardfork.

Ok, what about them?

Not only is this an incomplete sentence, which is often OK for bullet points, nothing around this point actually uses it. It's just s sentence floating in the middle of nowhere.

May as well say:

• Cats that eat fish.

Ok, what about them?

But let's assume that this bullet point, which is part of three criteria to build a list of 20 accounts to take action against, is something concrete.

So we have a list of 20 accounts someone is mad at, I guess. So what? Mad at them for abandoning Steem? Mad at them for being involved in Hive? I'm still trying to understand what they did that requires a softfork.

For that matter, what does this softfork even propose to do? If it's going to do something reversible, whatever that is, why would it also need an appeal process involving the SPS if it's reversible?