I think the current EIP is flawed in that it actually encourages passive investors to move from being a less disruptive ass (self voting) to being a more disruptive ass (delegating to bid bots), and it comes at a rather steep price for the potential for growth of the platform by making it more difficult for new users to enter.

As it is now though I'm afraid:

• The increased owner ROI and decreased user ROI caused by the EIP will result in a price correction.
• The price correction will free up money being currently pumped around by bid-bot users, increasing demand
• The down-vote pool will scare self up-voting passive investors towards delegating to bid-bots, increasing supply.

The exact opposite of what the EIP should accomplish IMO.

With two minor changes though, I believe both the unintended incentive and the unfortunate effects on new accounts can be greatly attenuated up to a point where the EIP could be effective in moving passive stake holders away from investing in bid bots while having minimal remaining impact on platform growth.

So I really hope Steemit Inc and influential witnesses will consider these two minor changes before rolling out HF21. I'm convinced the EIP can be made into something constructive.