Yes, i know no offence. Several people have said the same but i this is an evolution and subject to change as i have thought of it several times and before it started. Overall, there is not one word that can cover our message here. We are saying that no one doesn't have talent and that is all what we are saying but "talented" would cover this and not any word can. "untalented" does even more in covering this message although it subjective when it comes to interpretion except one has time to take a closer look, so "untalented" even if it ends up being it will have a bold slogan to explain the context. This post explains the context better and the comment section as well.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@surpassinggoogle/steemit-s-untalented-is-in-beta-participate-freely-because-every-participant-in-this-contest-will-win-something-no-losers

A word i have tried out in developing a name is "un(dis)talented" but basically every singular one complicates things. The curriculum evolves its whitepaper so i am also looking at response and reaction of community. No one is untalented for sure. "untalented" encourages attempts at out-of-the-boxness, sifting the good even from the not-so-good, finding sense in nonsense, so i also wanted a name that will apply people into seeking the underlying etc "untalented" is more of a curriculum, so along with the word "untalented" there is a curriculum that will help us grasp the meaning e.g i call myself the illiterate and it is possible to pass across the wrong message but we are simply saying their bigger things in the world than literate or illiterate; it is more of a contest thing and emphasizes the extra need for a measure of depth to create awesomest version of human. We seek to reach the entire world and i also though of that in coming up with "untalented". this world will stir attention even if misunderstood, it will catch attention then upon understanding the concept, it will have capture valuabler, deeply-rooted interest