😓
Change does not lead to results if there is no collective approach and if this is not applied over a longer period. And certainly not if the approach is subject to scrutiny.

The modus operandi of a group of corrupt Steemians who pull the strings month after month has flared up again in discussions. Perhaps it would also be worth looking into that.
The deals struck amongst themselves, with several members of a clique spread across the Steemit curator teams. This is one of the reasons to nominate a Steemit Curator, next to the idea that all Steem curators write good content and therefore the risk isn't taken to nominate someone new, someone who might have used AI.
This all already been discussed for months, if not years, and never taken seriously. The same counts if it comes to not nominate a Steemcurator. I am curious to hear how many teams never did , or even mentioned the number of nominated (and rewarded) curators in their reports.

It’s a shame that there aren’t more teams this month (and in general) that are actively posting comments and making connections. There is certainly a great need for this, just as there is for genuine guidance for newcomers asking for help.