The truth is not dictated by the mainstream media nor is it determined by consensus. I'm not claiming to have analyzed any injuries accurately nor could I if given the opportunity. However multiple military surgeons who can compare these injuries to what they have witnessed, have come forward and stated their opinions.

If I claimed I was injured with a similar injury and similar evidence and started a gofundme for my recovery, what would happen? If I didn't have the mainstream media to defend me, the evidence of my injury would probably not hold up if I was ever questioned for fraud. Now if people want to investigate my claim and suggest I'm a fraud while presenting their reasons why, are these people going to get labelled as insensitive bullies? Maybe if my injuries were legitimate my friends and family would be outraged and attack them, but the general population would likely label them heroes for exposing me. So where do we draw the line in investigating victims? A fraud is a fraud no matter what and I'm not saying any of these victims are frauds but if we are all being deceived, asking the victim or the medical staff supposedly involved isn't going to reveal the deception.