Could this be why the leftists want Islam everywhere, and why they will let no one challenge the actions of Muslims?
I know it has been a great mystery for many places as to why Muslim people and those who identify as followers of Islam are allowed to commit crimes in countries unchallenged, are invited into a country and given homes, etc and it has been made a crime to say anything negative or question Muslims.
There are many ideas. Though I just had an AH HA moment, and I don't know if there is anything to it, but I figured I'd go ahead and toss it into the steemit domain and see what happens.
I just wrote a piece before this concerning some intellectuals talking about the Frankfurt School and how they went to the U.S. in the 1940s and where they essentially coined the idea of cultural Marxism.
They realized that grouping people by classes like WORKER versus OWNER didn't work in places like the United States. It worked in Russia when it became the Soviet Union, and it worked in China under Mao as they became Communist. Yet, it did not resonate within the U.S. as the American Dream was about being able to move between these classes, and it actually occurred quite often with hard workers. The U.S. at the time was not a population that expected something for nothing, they did not feel they were entitled to something if they didn't work to earn it.
That obviously is not the case in the U.S. today and a lot of that could be potentially due to the Frankfurt School expatriots that immigrated to California and began with the universities and spread into Hollywood culture.
Cultural Marxism was their new tool. Sometimes today we call it Social Marxism.
The entire way the revolutions occurred in other countries was to convince people they were not individuals but to see themselves instead as part of a group. It was based around getting people to not only buy into generalizations and stereotypes, but to believe they themselves were one of those stereotypical groups.
Once this was done all they need to do is find some other group and somehow convince either or both groups that they were somehow a victim of actions of the other group.
This is what they did with workers versus owners in other countries. The model shifted and they realized all they really need to get people to do is view themselves as the OPPRESSED and then give them an enemy that is OPPRESSING them.
So what about the trend of allowing muslims to essentially invade many countries, not be held accountable to the law, and to punish anyone that challenges or questions this?
Could it be because they know that the groups they've had fighting based upon racism, fascism, feminism, might actually one day wake up and realize they have been lied to. They have been taught to be a victim, and the only thing holding them back is that they keep walking around in the world with the idea they are a victim rather than thinking of themselves as a hard worker, or a patriot, or a kind person. How we view ourselves has huge impact.
So if these people realize that these oppressed versus oppressor situations are largely false and are stirred up by over emphasizing the minor number of cases that actually fit so that it seems like they are happening at a far larger degree than they are then they might stop seeing themselves as a victim.
This doesn't work for Social Marxism.
There is a solution though.
What happens if you allow perhaps the least intolerant and actual anti-feminist religion in the world which is not just a religion but has demands to be government within its teachings to occupy/invade these countries?
You would essentially be actually putting an oppressive ideology/political movement in place. It has religious parts of it thus people will say you can't challenge it due to freedom of religion.
The problem is it is more than a religion. It pushes for Shariah Law which is a form of a government. It desires a Caliphate.
So if you challenge it, it is not due to you being anti-religion. It is because these extra features of Islam are not compatible or tolerant of other religions, and laws.
There are practitioners of Islam that do not embrace Shariah law, and the negative aspects, but by doing so they actually are choosing not to do as the Koran dictates. I am glad they do. Yet, there are an increasing number of them that do not.
It is very anti-feminist and is actually one of the most oppressive forces against women on the planet at the moment.
It is extremely intolerant to homosexuality and places around the world that it is dominant are known for killing homosexuals.
Many of the countries in Europe that they have invaded are frequently suffering rape gangs, and have many no go zones.
So what sane reason would these leftist ideologues have for inviting in such an oppressive group of people with no interest in assimilation?
Well first... whether we can actually call them sane is debatable.
Yet it would change the dynamics with regards to Social Marxism. The Oppressed versus Oppressor dichotomy becomes REAL. They no longer need keep juggling the lies and finding new ways to incite racial hatred, sexual intolerance, etc.
Many of the Muslims that take things literal or to extremes will feel compelled to Oppress the infidel, the woman, etc. Their religion, and their Shariah law demands it.
So as more and more people begin to wake, and see through the propaganda bullshit they are left with a problem. How long can they keep all the lies that are not based on fact juggled in the air?
Likely not much longer.
So what if they can make the oppressor and oppressed situation no longer a lie?
That was my AH HA thought.

i read you post but i don,t get what you want to say properly??
can you explain in easy words so i can get what who want to say??
Save it. Youre too stupid to understand anything .
i think you want downvote for sure :P
I'm not sure I can. This is not an easy subject to write about. It would take quite some time and a lot of writing for me to come up with a way to simplify it.
I'll think about it. If it will help other people and I can think of a way then I will do so. Though I am uncertain how to do that without spending some time contemplating it.
I found a very good article that while not covering specifically what I am talking about here does cover pretty much everything in some detail
GLOBAL MIND VIRUS
With regards to my discussions about SOME people who follow Islam and sadly an increasing number of them I am trying to recall the specific word from Mohamed that @everittdmickey introduced me to that essentially means "invasion by immigration". It begins with an H. Something like Haejin, or something of that nature. I am trying to find it as I'd never heard of it before until recently.
This site also talks about some of what I was talking about, but I was talking about how OTHERS (Social Marxists) are supporting this since it makes a lot of their artificial OPPRESSOR versus OPPRESSED situations real.
https://civilusdefendus.wordpress.com/civil-defense/4-stages-of-islamic-conquest/
The Left and Islam have a common goal - destroy Western culture and civilization. They are fellow travelers.
That is why modern feminists almost never criticize Islam. Modern feminism is right from the neo-Marxist / post-Modernist school.
Yet, so many of the participants do not realize this is the goal. They are blind followers. If we can give even a few of them at a time sight that is a good thing. It's not easy, but most things worth doing are not.
Hi @dwinblood - I just found you in my list - wondered how your health is? As a result of that post that you put up some months back, I did the Master Cleanse and got off meat, dairy, sugar and caffeine. I slowly moved back so that now I am eating a little sugar and caffeine but still no meat or dairy although I admit I slipped a couple of times. I feel a lot better. How are you doing?
Thanks for asking. I am doing better a little bit at a time. I've been on a self imposed low sodium diet since then. I am on Lisinopril medication at the moment as my blood pressure was dangerously high and waiting with how high it was and how sustained high it was was a risk not worth taking.
So my diet is self imposed and not required due to the medication, but I do it to hopefully get back to a state where I no longer need it.
I have some caffeine, I eat very little sugar. If I each much sugar I feel exhausted later in the day and have to take a nap, so I avoid it.
I bought a fitbit and have been doing more and more walking every day. I am starting to feel better that way too. The most I've walked in a single day since then has been 7 miles, and I only did that once. I've gotten around 4 miles a few times, and I am generally more than 2 miles per day and increasing that.
Many people at my job decided to get fitbits as we all work from home, and we challenge each other. This is pretty neat as several times it has forced me to go just that extra little bit to pass someone else.
So hopefully I am on the path to doing better. I think I am.
Great!!! Glad to hear it. I am doing calisthenics in my apartment daily myself- and working at my bffs ranch in the weekend... we’ll get ourselves back in shape!!! Yea!!!
Good analysis. The radical left has teamed up with Islam, because Islam will be the tip of the spear, or the hammer, to bully people into accepting all forms of cultural marxism, making everything taboo to speak of. Reducing the overton window to the size of a thimble.
Tell me what you think of this quote:

I also just found that whether the letter that comes from actually existed or not is a matter of contention.
It may have. Yet it may also be a hoax.
http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike2.htm
By hoax I mean someone fraudulently making such claims much like the Hitler Diaries that came out.
Though it also could be legit. Simply look at it with a grain of salt.
EDIT: If the quoted sections in that link are accurate then I'd call it a hoax simply due to:
Simply because the word Nazi is a contraction of National Socialist German Workers Party. That term did not exist during the lifetime of Pike.
Yet that quote may be someone paraphrasing and offering their own interpretation.
Yet an earlier quote on the same page refers to Communism. I had to look and it IS possible Pike would have known that term, though it was referred to by other means for awhile. It is slightly possible he may have encountered the term after it was in use. Since your shared quote says 1871 it is still possible, but that had me thinking for a moment.
Nazi on the other hand there is no explanation for that... unless like I said someone is writing their own interpretations other than his actual quote.
Thanks so much for 3 GREAT replies!!
When I was originally reading your post it popped that Pike quote into my mind so I felt I had to share it with you. I am so glad you took it and dug in.
Most people see the Luciferian portion in that letter and it shuts down all of their ability to critically think about the material in it. I think that most of the material you see presented from prominent people in Freemasonry as history requires extreme scrutiny. ALL HISTORY is a lie agreed upon, written by the victorious of the time. I always ask myself, If there was a plan for all this in 1871, and it was easily accessible to the general public, how would it be possible for the plan to still stand and be put into action some 70-150 years later? Did Albert Pike even exist as we are told he did or is this a persona being built up to serve a different purpose? If I am not mistaken he is the only southern general to have a monument in Washington DC, Why him?
The earlier quote that includes Nazi's brings into question all of the quotes from him in my opinion. I think this shows that quotes and words or even books and authors may not be what we are handed. EG: George Orwell was very likely a pen name or was possibly the person who brought the writing of Eric Blaire to publish. Very hard to say as none of us were there to witness. We are presented these people and items to point at and identify and most people stop once they are able to say I know who said that, and never take the next step to actually look at the person that is presented and not the material.
The Pike quote does mention the big 3 Monotheist religions in it which is interesting. I think this quote relates directly to the leftist and how division of populations is their modus operandi. The concept of fighting against individuals in smaller segments of a population vs trying to fight off the ideas of individuals who have formed a stronger and larger community. Either way the tactic of the authoritarians will always be to sow division for the purpose of creating a problem that doesn't exist. They truly want to be the ones on top of a fully collectivized population and there is no better way to march toward that then to provide solutions to the problems that they have created. Islam being thrust into the western world right now is the latest problem being employed to this end. Until humanity is ready to stop with this collective non sense and acknowledge the smallest minority (the individual) we will see this cycle repeat and move forward centralizing every aspect of every persons life.
PS: I am going to dig in deeper to Albert Pike again. It has been a while since I really looked at the time line and story we are presented about him. Gonna grab the Morals and Dogma off the book shelf and give it a re-read.
Interesting quote. I've of course heard of Albert Pike, but I have never seen that particular quote.
I do see some value in the quote, though personally I am not someone who believes in Lucifer.
I do believe in Good and Evil. To me they essentially boil down to voluntaryism and involuntaryism.
With that said. It doesn't matter if I believe in Lucifer or not if there are those that take action that do.
I also see it as a particular waste of time to try to cast things into a body of some supernatural Lucifer that I can't personally do a lot about.
I focus on what I can do.
Though I will say the quote has some important things to consider that can be considered without focusing on the religious parts of it.
Though I do know the World War III bit was an addition since he lived and died before any of the World Wars.
You did stoke my curiosity though and I'll have to look into Pike with more depth than I have before. I just knew of him in terms of Free Masonry.
Look, as many people have said already, it is easy to bring the people to war. All one needs to be willing to do is murder X number of people. Bam! You can get people to go to war. It isn't hard. I would guess most wars were planned to happen. That's no surprise. This is one of many reasons to remove the system as we know it today. Without that system, individuals cannot be so easily brought to war.
Couldn't agree more! One more step I would add is that one identifiable population always has to be de-humanized so that the effort and energy can become hate and discord and directed accordingly.
Yeah, the "Those people don't matter" mentality disgusts me. They're not me. What's happening to them must be deserved. It isn't my home being bombed. Those are not my loved ones being blown to bits. Therefore, I don't care...
Someone in another thread yesterday said the world is relatively peaceful, and they didn't understand why so many people were complaining. Peaceful?! They must be living under a rock, or perhaps they spend their day playing video games on the couch.
So I am now reading up some more on Albert Pike. I also now remember hearing about him in reference to the KKK. So I guess I knew of him in terms of Freemasonry, and the KKK.
I don't spend a lot of time thinking about the KKK. I don't view people by race. While I know there are people that do, I believe they are currently much smaller and number than people would think. Though the media is intentionally fanning the flames of racism and trying to expand racism of all kinds as far as I can tell, so I do think racism is growing. Yet it is not against only one particular color. It is against white people, black people, hispanic people, jewish(not necessarily a race... the race would be Hebrew if I was speaking race) people, etc.
Yet my current readings on Albert Pike did lead me to some interesting things.
Palladism was one of those and I thought it interesting that Pythagoras was alleged to have brought that out of Egypt. I thought that interesting as another thing Pythagoras did is form one of the earliest known Communist city states. It didn't survive long after his death. I see Social Marxism, Neo-Marxism, etc as a big part of the problems with the world at the moment and find it interesting how it keeps finding tendrils back to things that fuel the concept of Communism.
Which isn't surprising considering Communism is greatly about slaying individuality and viewing everything as a monolithic group. The great equalizer though equality of outcome is impossible and anti-reality. The ultimate monopoly. The ultimate in involuntarism.... i.e. evil. Evil that is embraced as people are yanked around by their emotions and made to think it is compassionate when it is the opposite of that.
I'll continue reading on Pike. Yet that thought is what it inspired so far.
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

Relevance: Asking the question "Why are Leftists promoting a culture that go against everything the say to the public?"
Our Purpose
Based on all the anti white male talk being pushed through media, laws and university I always leaned more as it was to displace the host race/builders. They really seem focused on the whole bad white man narrative enough, wanting all to come who are not of the racial composition of the founders and builders. I would not be surprised if within my lifetime they tear down every monument to the founders and teach the kids what evil men the whole lot of them were
Yes, but there are white muslims too. :)
lol, true. But the flood of Islamic refugees who don't understand we don't rape women while making demands for change is not predominantly the white Muslims, is it? I also can't help notice that one of the major attacks by the left on those who don't want them is because we are racist, which is because they also see that is predominantly non white Muslims.
Straight-talking formulation of what is going on. This only reinforces that tickle in the back my head that Cultural Marxism is being instrumentalized to bring about a neo-feudal technocracy (together with the Cloward and Piven Strategy (overburden welfare states to the point of collapse by eliminating borders and importing non-contributing resource consumers) +The Kalergi Plan (top-down forced miscegenation in the belief it will create a population that is easier to control)). I want to note that I don't claim this is what is happening, but there do appear to be certain uncanny similarities. Great post, resteeming this.
There is so much going on I am starting to think that no matter what we point out it likely is not completely something that fits into a single Universal Theory of Everything as applied to what they are doing.
I must remember they are humans, and thus they are susceptible to human limits and fallibility.
I believe it is essentially a war on many fronts, but some are bigger than others.
Great informationwaring..thanks for sharing...
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvote this reply.
At first i feel your bot js absolutely a spam and useless. But listening to content vs reading. Indeed saves a llt of time and my eyesights. Good tool. But i would prefer if you ask for permission from author before you post.
Anyone can translate my posts to any language, or audio, or video if they want. I am fine with that. I'd like them to give me credit for the original, but beyond that I am okay with translations. I consider this an audio translation. :)
Yeah they're lucky they met you :) Some might not think it's a great feature. So asking permission is always better.